Thursday, February 14, 2008

Birthday Poems For An 18 Year Old

Erdogan's call for Germany's colonization



A Turkish march through the institutions?


This commentary on the much debated question of the Turkish Minister Erdogan's call for Turkish schools and universities in Germany, his demand for learning the German language and integration - but radical rejection of assimilation contains, besides the extract part of his speech, no other websites or resources, but is only my opinion and experience as a writer dar. But with over 20 years international experience - that is, a time when I even foreigners working in foreign countries was - I may have to contribute some thoughts and observations that may be one or the other for thought.

First, however, the excerpt from the speech of Erdogan:


Today you have achieved in Germany alone
numerical strength of nearly three million. You have now
contributed for 47 years with your work, your efforts to ensure that
Germany is progressing, that Germany is in Europe and the world a
powerful country. They have worked on the one hand, on the other hand,
you have tried yourself, your identity, Your culture, your traditions preserve
. Your eyes and your ears were always directed at Turkey.
the fact that you have kept for 47 years, your language, your beliefs, your values, your culture
, but above all that you have always supported each other
this fact lies beyond all recognition.


I understand the sensitivity you show towards assimilation
, very good. Nobody can expect you to tolerate assimilation.
No one can expect from you that you submit to assimilation.
Because assimilation is a crime against humanity, you should contact the
be aware of.


But we must also take note of the following: You can
in Germany today, in Europe today, in today's world, no more than "the other" as one who is only here temporarily ,
look, do not and view,. The Turkish community has spent
the full 47 years for this country. Not only in Germany,
many European countries is approaching the number of our citizens almost five million. It is remarkable that Despite this immense use, despite the numerical strength, certain fundamental problems in these Countries are still not on the agenda. Of course, our children will learn Turkish. This is to share your native language and it is your natural right
your native language to your children.


However, you would if you learn the language of the country you live in the
, or even more languages to benefit in every aspect of it
. Look, many of our children here learn at an early age
no foreign languages. These children are confronted with German until
when they start school. And that means that these children
in comparison to other students, the school career with a disadvantage of 1 - 0 must begin
. But it would be for you and your children in any way
be advantageous if you exhaust the possible maximum, which the
offers good local school system to you.


you will have a job, you are taking public services in
claim. If the language of the country do not speak, not
learn, you inevitably fall into a situation of disadvantage.


Next: For years, an attitude has prevailed, by a distance
to politics in this country over foreign policy, the
Domestic Policy, social policy was characterized. But should the Turkish community
be with her three million people in the position to exercise in the German political landscape
influence to achieve effects.
(shouting "Turkey is proud of you'')


Why should we not in Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, in the other European countries also have mayors?

Why should we not agents and
groups in the political parties?

Why should we
in the German Parliament, in the EU Parliament does not have more representatives?
Why should our views in the formulation of social policy
countries in which we live, are not taken seriously?

assimilation. assimilation means "align incorporate, merge. If a government structure that part of the immigrant population incorporated - as the first in Germany with Szcimaniaks the Wischnewski, the ... is done for Poland, so they live today as German feel to be a German, married to Germans - only the assumed name of the Father still says something about their origins. But no one came today to the idea not to consider them as German. They were originally built and have been assimilated in the course of a generation or two (adjusted). They have also represented the interests of Germany in politics - be it only to Mr. Wischnewski ("Ben Wisch") recalls, it is very positive memories.

If we let the Green Alliance's parody of the German language aside - and I mean this "citizens with migration background" - so there is a distinction based on three criteria:


  1. the non-permanent workers (Official German: residence permit) who works for a number of years of financial interest in another country and live

  2. the long term in this country living, which will eventually assume the citizenship of the host country ( ad: residency or citizenship - then with full rights and obligations)

  3. represents those whose home country, a dictatorship, where he was politically persecuted in the host country and now receive political asylum.

In the history of Germany, there have been the first group. It has been since the industrialization of Poland, who came to the Ruhr area and mainly home in Germany and were more and more in the second group (b) changed. After the war, there was only the Italians who returned mostly back to Italy - just like most other Europeans. In recent decades, there were also Turks who could give their wives in Anatolia, daughters with "honor killing" followed and in the vast majority of the partout non-integrated, ghettos formed and often placed on learning the language no value even their "small-Ankara" founded and have rather seen that they located on a colonization of the host country.

However, there was also German, which is in other countries had issued:


  1. the category of expatriates working for German and international companies abroad, the stay is usually strictly limited and tied to the employment contract.

  2. German who emigrated permanently - for example, about two hundred years after Russia, America or Australia - and more recently in Switzerland or EU countries, then rare in the United States, Canada or Russia.

  3. During an inglorious chapter of German history, many German immigrants of all religions, but mainly members of the Jewish faith, as political refugees from. In the postwar years was this movement to a halt and took in the recent past again.

two decades, I was even on the first category. Thus, I also knew the problems of integration or assimilation. If you have a certain level of education has, is the integration in general no problem assimilating in the sense of adaptation is a slow process and finds its limits in your discipline, your own morality and their specific requirements and also in the context of daily contacts. According to their activities abroad can "slip" as someone with little background very easily, which I noticed in the vast majority of the observations. German glide abroad also, from a lack of orientation in a right-wing camp - which they by the way not very different from less educated Turks. However, the environment consists of business executives, administrative directors, ministers, and also to together, remains our own patterns of behavior almost unchanged - assimilation takes place only in the manners. Assimilation would thus take place until the second or third generation - but would remain preserved the social standard.

The observed Turks in Germany, the problem lies in the vast majority of cases, but much different. It outweighs the proportion of Turks, although for purely financial reasons the work competed in Germany - but lack of preparation and lack of language skills so that very soon tended to ghettoization. The prime example is Berlin's Kreuzberg district, also called "small Ankara. Within the ghetto there are customs and traditions, even as in the deepest Anatolia. There may also be someone of the German language to be powerful - he is inevitably caught up with his surroundings and marked. And that the Turkish guest workers in Germany for 47 years "spent" have is a bold thesis - he was the significantly higher salary because, it was even his apartment in Turkey from the "expenditure" buy - but he must therefore mitkaufen not equal political rights in Germany.

Then, if still a politician - even worse, a prime minister - the community of foreigners calling to embark a march through the institutions, to undermine the policies to shape the policies of the host country in accordance with individual needs, then comes to me the same ridiculous, as if I had said at the time in the host country of the President: "Écoute mon vieux, moi ta cede place!" As a foreigner, I HAD to respect the cultural form of the host country, I can not minister to say what he has to do - it can at I present the President the facts and realize that it in my presence his ministers' together failed .. as a Ro lounging. '. Such a thing has, however, history - and it's my secret to which country it is. But there is always at the discretion of the owner - the President in the given case, because he is without any ifs and buts host of his country.

This same law would also be the host, the same social status and equal education to give when you have someone as a neighbor - or more generally to do with someone who has. esteem and respect are, finally, the landmark for the country someone comes from, as well as their own home.

The ideal case of emigrating, if you already mastered the language, history and culture of the country's decision and know the country already loves, not less or more than your own home. You have to feel connected with the soul of the country and its people.

is often unpleasant male behavior, Turkish youth in Germany - which hardly stands out from the standard of honesty saw Turkish officers - during the last one, and certainly stay in Turkey. Only 'cheap' is not a preference criterion. So may then wonder also Turks, so to them over a certain reserve can prevail.

is no less presumptuous is the desire to set up in Germany, Turkish schools or even universities. That may make it to Turkey in Turkey itself. There are plenty of Turkish students at German universities, and as such, they are welcome, too - because education is also stressed by standard and manners. Similarly, there are no objections, if Turkey can get their consulates in their Turkish Turkish lessons children - because if they intend to undertake further training in Turkey. Or imagine institutions would be similar to the Goethe Institute, where courses are offered. Certainly, such Institute will soon be "overcrowded" with interested parties in the Turkish language. Widespread Anglophone cultural centers, the Centre Culturel Français, are Italian and English groups of friends. Next nationwide Pushkin Institute would certainly welcome. From a German perspective, it is always a benefit to learn foreign languages - but it must be the right one!

The passion of the debate that has arisen over the presence of Prime Minister Erdogan in Cologne, suggests that in the Cologne Arena only banana peels were designed. He may, many Turkish voters in Germany have won - but no more. For colonization Germany, Turkey needs many, many decades - if not eternity - to the deep trench advised by the foreclosure.


© Rumpelstilz Political Global 14-02-2008


Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Condolence Messages In Spanish

lies in politics?

are struggling German combat troops

not in southern Afghanistan?


To what extent is the statement of the Federal pulpit Merkel's face it - or to what extent is their statement that German soldiers of the Bundeswehr would not be on the side of the U.S. terrorist as part of Operation Enduring Freedom "and kill civilians in Afghanistan, a conscious deception of the population is - to fight in return by the Taliban as foreign aggressors ultimately? The war in Afghanistan is a pure war of aggression to secure the supply of opium and heroin and to reduce it through subjugation of Afghanistan the way for a pipeline from Turkmenistan through Afghanistan and Pakistan to the Indian Ocean (where Turkmenistan long since joined the Russian pipeline system added.) But U.S. insanity is indeed one of the future as Russia's war aims (see missiles stationed around Russia).

The U.S. had called for the NATO meeting in Vilnius to extend the deployment of German soldiers fighting in Afghanistan. Der Spiegel "We are all allies ours, including Germany, ask at the NATO summit in Bucharest in April, much to catch up with us soldier for soldier, euro for dollar," wrote the U.S. ambassador to NATO, Victoria Nuland, a neocon hardliner in an article for the Berliner Zeitung. Regarding the NATO policy is a detailed analysis of their expansion HERE about the IRC .

Even Republican presidential candidate John McCain has called for additional German troops in Afghanistan: "We need more German in Afghanistan," where the stability of an entire region is at stake, McCain said in an interview with SPIEGEL. The American senator who would be after his success in the Super Tuesday presidential candidate in the summer of Republicans, argued at the same time that America after the unilateralism of the last time "in future multilateral acts." Washington's war in Iraq, he defended a second time - a U.S. withdrawal, the terrorist organization al-Qaida would encourage to make her way to America - and, of course, with a commitment the armed forces in active combat operations, to Germany. Hillary Clinton is no less deeply involved in the war policy, as practiced by the Republicans. Republican as well as subject to mandatory Democrates the Council on Foreign Relations and thus David Rockefeller.

The Chancellor, the Merkel (CDU) rejected as well as the SPD (pelvic) and again the deployment of Bundeswehr combat troops to the side of the U.S. solfaten-off in the dangerous south of the country. "We are strongly committed to our responsibilities in the north," she told the Hamburger Abendblatt. The parliament has passed a few months ago a mandate for the use, applies to October. "There is nothing to be changed," stressed the Chancellor. The Merkel also claimed the reconstruction of Afghanistan want to give it more weight, at least she wanted it at the NATO summit in Bucharest to speak in April - a month before the Federal Republic of Germany ratified the EU Treaty. Then their minds will have no weight anymore. In any case, the funds share in Afghanistan as follows: 85 billion for the war, only 8.5 billion for reconstruction. The rebuilding will hardly make money - but the war (see IRC).

April is in this case, only one step further discussion. The actual step, however, follows in May, when Angela Merkel with the ratification of the EU Treaty, the sovereignty of Germany and also available on the Bundeswehr releases - over to the new power structure of Germany, which had to surrender it worked consistently during its EU presidency.

The was to the Merkel at the Bilderberg conference in 2005 carried over from David Rockefeller task of Germany in the European Union to pass without granting the Federal citizens with this right of democratic participation - to allow that is not a referendum on the reformed EU treaty.

France, which had a referendum already commented negatively on the EU constitution, through the use of the Jewish Nicolas Sarkozy as president of France deprived of any voice and are therefore under the provisions of Germany as well as David Rockefeller, in turn, the inner circle of the 'Zionist Anglo-American financial and power-cartel' and thus the 'one-world government' is. In France, Sarkozy has ignored the people and ratified without democratic legitimacy of the EU Treaty. Only Ireland has insisted the law of the referendum for his people. To establish this central power EU is already the sum of 65 billion euros to the Global Security Fund (GSF) is available, however, to complete only the dictatorship. The GSF was discovered by the Council of Europe Member Steve Mosley. For a better idea of this vast financial power This was announced here: 65 Bln. means 65 000 000 000 000 €, and is used to replace the world power USA, which is due to the completely hollowed dollar currency anyway from total collapse. This sum has been active for two years and it has a concentration in the individual economies of the EU, in companies leads to mass layoffs by companies, some of those released can then be reinstated as a low-wage workers. on

The 12th December 2007 as decided in Lisbon EU Treaty admits most extensive powers of the Brussels government. All the liberties that have been the last six decades in Germany had validity to be completely abolished with the EU. to break

avoid any resistance to establishing itself in terrorist dictatorship of the EU or to thwart, in all EU countries have already established step by step corresponding control structures - just as they are established in Germany by Wolfgang Schäuble. These control measures include not only the monitoring of telephone traffic, Internet and spying on the hard drives that store all flight data, and store all data on car travel video cameras and toll bridges and highways at all times control all bank accounts - and for those who still imagined a prison in cash, by micro chips in the notes (confirmed by the printers Gieseke & Devrient). The small burn hole on the metal strip is on the placement of the microchip - d urchgebrannt in a microwave. All issued cards - such as federal identity cards and passports also contain micro chips - but this is only a precursor to the citizens to be implanted microchips. Any citizen of the EU will be monitored and unfree, fremdbeherrschtem factor of production in the future, neither his whereabouts nor his work and also do not determine everything about their personal relationships may. The space available to the central computer is located in Brussels under the name 'La Bete'.

The last step is a summary of power under a proven spineless EU president, who unconditionally the orders of the 'one-world government "under the auspices of Rothschild and Rockefeller, among the European royal families and the Catholic Church - under which the Jesuit Kalvenbach, running. The role of the EU superpower, the final war for the conquest of his world domination, a war that has turned against Islam as well as against Russia with his Orthodox faith.

fact that a British head of state and member of the Anglican Church is taking just what even the Princess Lady Diana had cost the life (leaving the Anglican faith by marriage) seems to the former Prime Minister Tony Blair on the part of the 'A- world government 'accepted to be, he had joined it in support of the Iraq war unconditionally the Bush lies about alleged mass destruction weapons - knowing that this was a lie, his secretary was in on the Bush-admission interview Blair (reported by Nelson Rockefeller article appeared in the magazine 'The New Yorker). Tony Blair had to send, no certainty conflicts of British soldiers because of it as a lie-known reason for war with U.S. terrorists in Iraq. Tony Blair is the faith of the Anglican church converted to the Catholic Church. He will turn in future responsibilities in the proposed EU presidency, both against Islam and against the Orthodox Church in Russia. Tony Blair is a candidate for the forthcoming EU presidency.
ADDENDUM Wednesday, 13-2-2008 - now under Tony Blair sent messages is also recommended by President Sarkozy for the EU presidency. This should mean because of Blair's allegiance to the Zionist Anglo-American financial power and antitrust unquestionably, an expansion of military actions in the framework of EU and NATO.

If Merkel said today the bold, non-German soldiers would fight in Operation Enduring Freedom "on the side of the U.S. terrorists in Afghanistan, so the only question, are as as their excuse, when the EU presidency decreed that the army receives after all the marching orders. Their excuse is then therefore have no weight, because they headed purposefully to the ratification of the Treaty on European Union in May 2008 - just having regard to all consequences.

The "NO" from the Merkel is a "NO" - by which they already know that tomorrow it has no validity. The Merkel knows she once again makes a fool of the citizens.


© Rumpelstilz Political Global 12-02-2008

Saturday, February 9, 2008

Reactive Lymphocytes In A Dog

The DC circuit in the German media about Russia

The harsh criticism of President Putin

proves to be brainwashed


HE the Ambassador of the Russian Federation Vladimir Kotenev expressed in a Interview with the Journal Cicero about the image, which is distributed in the West about Russia and President Putin. This is the position of Ambassador perfectly understandable, provided you have the reader already has extensive background knowledge. In the weekly policy-Global we are aware, however, that the German on the background to having just can not, it was essential parts in the daily reporting deprived and sometimes even distorted part of history by omission distorts - quite simply, the media play the citizen "blind cow".

As the author This annotated interviews of the Ambassador of the Russian Federation and at the same time as a German, I have critically followed monitored the development in Germany and I am Russia through a number of longer visits and familiar work in Russia, so I try by commenting on the interview knowledge gaps among Germans close to help in a more objective opinion about Russia. Disturb me quite simply the gross and outrageous lies, such as are common in German media about Russia, even if it is known, were produced in which think tanks these fairy tales. Truly free journalists in Germany lose their jobs and remain permanently excluded. The Frankfurter Allgemeine even published in November 2001 a half-page article entitled: "We say goodbye to the free reporting" . As the web-based weekly magazine, we feel, and I are not obligated to censor the press. Free information and truth we believe to be one of the fundamental basic rights of every citizen.

The author of this article, I am son of a German since urdenkbaren generations of family who went into the Federal Republic in the American zone for the school, had graduated with English and French, with one-notes are Abi - that is a typical Wessi, but with many years of international experience in Anglophone and Francophone countries for a U.S. employer, I certainly know no East German opinion. However, I was stubborn enough, not long enough to let me impose any opinion - I preferred to search an open mind, make me my own picture - and here I share with my comments in the interview of the Ambassador of Russia.


Interview with Ambassador Vladimir Kotenew

  • question: Did the German media a fixed image of Russia?
  • SE Kotenew: you meet here at the same number of media stereotypes. I've just in a national daily newspaper an article on former Chancellor Gerhard Schröder read. The journalist wrote, Mr. Schroeder worked for Gazprom, Gazprom is in turn a State-controlled monster, and the state is being waged by the "KGB-man Putin. Will be made to believe so, because everything was KGB, along with Gerhard Schröder? Mr. Schroeder does not work in Gazprom. He is merely the chairman of the supervisory board of a consortium, made up of four companies, two German, one Dutch and Gazprom.
  • question ... the majority shareholder.
  • SE Kotenew: But first time as Mr Schröder before an international consortium that is building a gas pipeline from Russia to Germany. This North European gas pipeline is of vital importance for energy supply in Europe, a project that has endorsed the European Commission many years ago. Its then President Romano Prodi had asked our President Vladimir Putin even on the line. This is commonly known in Russia, only the Germans do not know.
  • question you can not understand the concern of Poland and the Baltic states?
  • SE Kotenew: know there are especially overseas, but also in Germany a number of think tanks. Journalists like to talk about facts here. But the decisive factor is, where do these facts. There are absolute truths: Mr X was born in Y. And then there is no confirmed information, and if not confirmed, then they usually disappear a day later. And there is widespread targeted information that is there to provoke any other information. Between all this information must find their way around the journalist.

comment Rumpelstilz:

The theme of former Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder, President Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin and the gas pipeline and the truth in the background

This issue requires a detour to the Chancellor Kohl and the presence of former U.S. Ambassador to Bonn and former CIA Deputy Director Vernon Walters, the latter being a serious effect on the design of the Federal Republic of influence. In Kohl, Helmut suddenly went the only major oil companies ARAL and DEA in the hands of BP Amoco and Shell. Thus, Germany had lost its autonomy abruptly in oil supply, was delivered at the mercy of the executive suites of the Anglo-American financial and power cartel, the occupation of Germany was extended from the military sector to the energy sector.

The challenge for Former Chancellor Schröder, the question of how Germany could be freed from the influence of the Anglo-American financial and power cartel. With increasingly installed gas heaters Germany was blackmailed by a supply stop by the companies BP Amoco and Shell and existing gas pipelines through Ukraine and Poland, American country ruled up to 100%. Russia, however, had been due to reliable deliveries during the past 30 years demonstrate trustworthiness - irrespective of its form of government in Russia, because addiction is always two sides - Germany needs oil and gas, Russia needs foreign exchange.

Since 2001, examined the various routes for pipelines. The analogy of Poland to the U.S. hegemony remained only nor the gas pipeline through Ukraine, but also led there, the last piece of the pipeline through Poland. With the USA in Ukraine staged orange "revolution" but also the Ukraine was unsafe to cantonists. Thus, the final choice was the project of Nord Stream pipeline, routing through the Baltic Sea, bypassing all the countries under U.S. domination.
The serious negotiations on the Baltic Sea route of the gas pipeline will be at the Bilderberg conference in Germany in 2005 to that of David Rockefeller set up by the former CIA http://www.zeit-fragen.ch/ausgaben/ 2007/nr2-vom-1512007/angela-merkel-eine-neokonservative-als-% 20praesidentin-the-european-union / FDJ propagandist Angela Merkel, the step by step under Kohl all obstacles and competitors were out of the way., Submitted the proposal to be Chancellor. The CIA is an organization that is 100% under the orders of the Rockefellers. The Chancellor Merkel was under-commitment to its promise to prevent any form of democracy in Germany and referendum and Germany to bring under the dominance of EU government - that is to extinguish an independent, self-determined Germany for good.

After David Rockefeller, the Merkel had taken to task could, surprisingly Gerhard Schröder, "voluntary" early Convene new elections. Each still be in Germany's closer ties with Russia in mind a long tradition of ties between Germany and Russia (even a German was much beloved czarina in Russia!) Should be avoided at all costs would have, but an alliance of Germany and Russia, the dominance by the oppose Anglo-American financial power and anti-trust (as the world government) even more efficiently. By then, the necessary cables were not brought fundamental agreements in the era of Chancellor Schroeder's conclusion. Volkswagen decided to build a plant in Kaluga and RWE and BASF concluded the contract with Gazprom to build the Nord Stream pipeline under the Baltic Sea - just 10 days before the early elections in Germany. Also, RWE took over Ruhrgas in Gazprom. This will complete the gas pipeline with Germany relating to gas supplies not be blackmailed - Schroeder and Putin have done the trick to avoid the possible blackmail Germany by the Anglo-American financial and power cartel.

With the announcement of the signing of the Treaty set up a hue and cry and cry on the part of the Baltic (US-governed) countries and (the US-dominated) of Poland, has been chastened by this Treaty, the Vernon reached Walters on coal dependence through the "sale" of Aral and DEA destroyed. The low response in Germany to the clamor and lamentations of Poland and the Baltic countries and forced Rockefeller to the United States to concoct in their think tanks, a new strategy ... the "supply uncertainty"!

order not to be hindered on the world market by punitive tariffs, was also in Russia, the desire to be accepted as a member of the (established by the United States) WTO. The next event was the think tank that is the demand that Russia should use its exports to world market prices - as well as on Ukraine. Also, the supply price for gas to Ukraine and Russia came under criticism, very gently announced the gradual adjustment of the gas price for Ukraine. The price should be increased $ 50 per 1000 cubic meters to 90 USD, which the U.S. President Yushchenko refused rigorously controlled there. Plain Speaking: The U.S. demanded Russia applying world market prices and at the same time rejected the U.S. in over their vassals Yushchenko an adjustment to world prices. One way or another in Russia had the Rockefellers of think tanks, and thus go from the United States set up traps.

In September 2005, was "allowed" the president of Ukraine, Yushchenko, arriving in Washington with Condoleezza Rice, and was ordered to report and fix the plan. The Ukraine had afterwards at any price negotiations with Russia and insisted on the same highly subsidized price of 50 USD per 1000 cubic meters of gas. And Russia to be included with the desire and the need in the WTO, had at least gradually adjust the price of gas in the direction of world prices. To accelerate the conflict also paid by Ukraine of the current gas deliveries stop, while at the same time by U.S. think tanks in Europe 'showdown' CDU-politician and capital-trust devout politicians and the Western press on the forthcoming Ukraine - Russia waited . was

for non-payment and lack of willingness to negotiate price on 1 January 2006, the Ukraine, turned off the gas valve, while the gas supply was located by the parallel pipeline to Western Europe with gas supplies from Russia unchanged - and as expected, Condoleezza Rice flew to Kiev and then only then on to Turkmenistan - Ukraine during the gas that was destined for Western Europe, had simply stolen and it fills their own gas reservoirs. The following day, Condoleezza Rice joined with fellow graduating every U.S. President a tilted gas supply 40 million cubic meters of gas at a price of 50 USD per 1000 cubic meters. However, this gas was in Turkmenistan - where you could not drain it into the air to get in a few thousand kilometers Yushchenko armed with a quiver in the air and the gas hopsend like butterflies again captures from the air. The gas was only through the pipelines from Turkmenistan, be through the pipelines from Kazakhstan and then passed through the pipelines from Russia. Transit contracts were not closed to the countries at the time.

The amount of gas stolen by Ukraine were of course not in Western Europe - and now began the previously planned and prepared defamation campaign against Russia for alleged unreliability of delivery. The purpose of the entire operation was the discrediting of Russia concerning the alleged unreliability of delivery with the aim that within Germany and the EU, the Nord Stream gas pipeline would be rejected by the Baltic Sea. Thus

used the USA by a Machiavellian plan of energy supplies For the second time as a weapon against Russia! While accusing the U.S. still has Russia, energy supplies to use as a weapon, but it is the U.S. itself, using energy supplies as a weapon, the U.S. is false, deceptive and try to force all countries in the world in its dependence. The merit Schroeder and Putin was to have Germany again provides an independence.

aforementioned is the concise correction of what s.Zt. was done, and I was able to observe up close. All points are all suitably detailed and I'm happy, this liars in front of the German-influenced U.S. media to represent a public TV conference.

But further in the interview with Ambassador Kotenew:

  • question: What are typical Russia stereotypes?
  • SE Kotenew: First, the Russian Government was of the KGB. Second, Russia is no democracy. Third, there is no press freedom.

comment:

So, you can normally wander around the Lyubyanka, the headquarters of the FSB (formerly KGB was called). The FSB has nothing frightening. Of course, applies to all government information from the state's own intelligence, as Germany also information from the BND, and the protection of the Constitution applies. And I say to no one that if Mr Kinkel or not Steinmeier headed the BND. Anyway, I feel much safer in Moscow and freer than in the Federal Republic. Because Germany is a response to German interests, but this peculiar subordination to U.S. interests in Germany makes life unpredictable ... except maybe for just a small average employees or workers. Anyone who has lived abroad, also know as our own intelligence work, facades behind which they hide, and that is under the supervision of German as a German services - and suddenly discover that as a German is not so free, even in Germany, as was thought before! ! ! For something you develop over time their own special antennas, a sixth sense. However, when I get into Domodjedovo off the plane, then I breathe freely, I feel free. My seventh sense says to me, I find myself once more into a free country. Domodjedovo is located at one of Moscow airports.

The criticism that Russia was no democracy is a purely rhetorical statement. For what is democracy? In Russia there has been no referendum - although the Duma election was a referendum trains. But what really is democracy? May vote in the German on the EU Treaty? This Contract should at least have constitutional status - and in the Basic Law states that it should be replaced by the sovereign (ie the people) have to be adopted constitution. And now allows the "Chancellor" Angela Merkel not a democracy. Probably corresponds to the avoidance of a referendum regarding the EU constitutional treaty in its commitment to Rockefeller on the occasion of the Bilderberg conference in 2005, when it by Rockefeller, the chancellor was promised. However, when Lever parliamentarians as representatives of the people by means of so-called imperative mandate to enforce undemocratic decisions of the people as sovereign, then the country is a dictatorship. Democracies, there is actually nowhere in perfection. Is the government in a Dictatorship for the sake of the population, it is nothing wrong with it. But the German dictatorship works against the interests of their own people! It is enough that everyone just think about it, so he agrees - and what not!

on the claim lack of press freedom in Russia even 'Der Spiegel' in a moment of derangement peculiar had provided a true indication, probably in the assumption that this discrediting Russia's press freedom. Der Spiegel wrote that in Russia 65% of the press are regierungsbeeinflußt. Hm, so what? ? That surely means that 35% of the press in Russia are free! In Germany there are 99% of the media disseminate government propaganda. I write here in Global Politics, a weekly magazine, which is located abroad - to report freely.

  • question hm -
  • SE Kotenew: still believed that Russians drink buckets of vodka. Moreover, there is the picture of these newly rich Russians who throw money around, and the Mafia. For the people here, Russia has always remained the same Russia: the Russia of Tsarist Russia, the Russia of the Soviet empire and now the Russian Federation. That's all Russia. I understand that, finally, have the borders of Germany changed in the last century, a few times, and yet Germany in the eyes of other nations always been Germany. But you have these periods differ from each other.
  • question have also changed the internal structure and the mentality in the Russian intelligence services?
  • SE Kotenew: came during the October Revolution of 1917 the Bolsheviks with Lenin, and they wanted to create a new world order. They opened all the archives of the Czar - but no one has made counter-steps. And proceed to Vadim Bakatin, the last chairman of the KGB. He surrendered to the Americans in 1991, the scheme of bugging devices in the American Embassy in Moscow in the hope that the Would do the same. It was a gesture of good will. A few years later we built a new Russian embassy in Washington, and finally turned out that the Americans had built an underground tunnel under our message with monitoring systems. So I will tell you that all states have intelligence agencies, including us. Of course we have no more KGB. Why was there ever such a powerful repressive apparatus? Because it would become after the turmoil of World War II and the then-revolutionary Russia to an easy target for a dozen powers, including Germany. And of course because it was Hitler.

comment

Russians are drinking buckets of vodka? Absolutely not. Otherwise, they would not fit on the legs in the morning and clear in my head - because they are any less inferior in work than in Germany. Rather, now the Germans are the drunkards. In Russia, one at work in the matter - and that means you no longer drinks out of his mind.

Since HE Kotenev brought up by the year 1917, I have to explain a little bit of it.
So here I must then go back a very well until 1917 - and a little further. Established in 1904 in England, a certain Halford Mackinder, the Heartland theory, which was afterwards raised to the theorem. It states that maritime nations (particularly Great Britain and the Commonwealth - with the long back on family clans ruled USA) could never achieve world domination, as long as they might to the central continent of Eurasia, of having to independently without using the Sea, unswervingly follow its own policy .

Now England and Great Britain is dominated by the Rothschild clan - simply by the enormous mass of money. The assets of the Rothschilds is inconceivable in a range of many tens of thousands of billions - accumulated during the last two centuries. But Russia was and is rich. It is an asset or feature to add their own wealth was and is paranoid megalomania.

used as a Zionist Jew Rothschild link to the present in Russia Khazar Jews, to Bronstein, who later called himself Trotsky, who was married also to a woman ship (the family boat was in the duplex of the Jewish ghetto in Frankfurt neighbor with the family Rothschild). Trotsky was a representative of the Bolsheviks and the Bolsheviks worked for Rothschild. And Lenin was given for the coup (later known as Revolution) by John D. Rockefeller (including Jews), nor the sum of ten million dollars in gold. The assets of the royal family was entrusted with great confidence of the Rothschild Bank in Paris. During the "revolution" was from England (where was the Rothschild family head), the response to the asylum request of the royal family as long as delayed until the latter was murdered. The assets of the royal family, the Rothschilds put into his own pocket and have it suppressed until today. You could call it a murderer. Only one is not as rich, if a family clan or group of people would not have met by criminal energy. In the next 70 years Russia was ruled by Khazar Jews. Bolshevism was a social concept of the Rothschilds. Under Yeltsin, who was using Rockefeller CIA Robert Gates coup to power, the Khazar Jews gained still more power and money, which but requires a separate and specific article. Only with progress of the Khazar Jews lost in Yeltsin's Russia in influence and power. Since then, Russia is ruled by a Russian, a Russian patriot who wants his country to the best of forces and reached. His name is Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin.

The 'Cold War' is, since President Putin has again taken the fate of Russia in Russian hands, broken out in full. This can be seen in the ongoing smear campaign and mendacious propaganda against Russia. The fact that again the activities of intelligence agencies play a role is, of course.

But with further Interview the SE of the Russian ambassador:

  • Question: According to Russian intelligence are now nothing more than properly functioning authorities?
  • SE Kotenew: ... so it is. By the way, they work more closely with their American, French and German colleagues in the fight against terrorism. And the fact that Putin has already served in the structures of the FSB, as they were called KGB, is overstated in the West completely.
  • question: hm
  • SE Kotenew: any case, we find the Russians German coverage our intelligence agencies a little strange. Take the tragic murder of Alexander Litvinenko, who is always referred to here as an agent. An agent is generally understood in a scout. Who goes to another country and collects information there.
  • Question: As Vladimir Putin mid-80s in Dresden.
  • SE Kotenew: that way. Litvinenko was an agent, they first prison guard. With the demise of the Soviet Union fell apart and the KGB, because there is too little and the people deserved more transactions made to be able to feed their family. The real professionals went away and then were even prison guards committed, because they had no one else.
  • question Why is there a company in your country such as Memorial, which advocates for historical information and human rights?
  • SE Kotenew: I do not know everything about the work of Memorial, but I feel that exaggerate a lot. It is good that deal with human rights. But here you see again the false understanding. For example, when I appeared on the show by Sabine Christiansen, as was said, Kasparov was a dissident. It is naive to call him as a dissident. This can be only one, who in a Totalitarian State, lives in a state that takes political dissidents jailed or even killed. It is crucial that these people are not allowed to leave the country. The Russia of today is but an open country, where people like Kasparov can protest publicly with crossed ballots and are to be assisted by Russian and foreign media all the time.
  • question: Why did Kasparov was recently arrested at a demonstration in Moscow?
  • SE Kotenew: He was arrested because he hurt with his bodyguards, the Russian law, by an authorized rally in a non- authorized demonstration by train through the center of the city was transformed.
  • question the radio station "Echo Moskvy" said Kasparov, however, he and other protesters were run only on the sidewalk.
  • SE Kotenew: about such details is to decide by the court. This breach was not the first. The man does not go to demonstrations, to express his beliefs.
  • question Why?
  • SE Kotenew: You have to ask him. But watch out times: in press conferences Kasparov can be seen mainly two microphones, ARD and ZDF, not CNN, not the Voice of America ".
  • question Are you saying that Americans would take him seriously?
  • SE Kotenew: But, they take it seriously. But it's interesting that it just accompany the German cameras everywhere.
  • question However, he was in his own words again unloaded at Sabine Christiansen, because you would have insisted.
  • SE Kotenew: That's not true.

comment on the interview:

Litvinenko had been for purely financial reasons, the Khazar Jews tendered Berezovsky, who fights out of hunger for power by all those who had given him the possibility of further looting of Russia built - President Putin.

And about Kasparov read HERE under "Kasparov" . It is unnecessary that I repeat myself several times. Kaparov is an "agent provocateur" for the U.S. and Rockefeller, the at least fulfills the duty to serve in the German media as a propaganda spectacle. Incidentally, Kasparov also a Khazar Jew, is his original name: Garik Weinstein and support of the U.S. Order 'Flame Award' of the NSAC.

And now back to the interview:

  • question: Is the press in Russia free?
  • SE Kotenew: Most Russians see it. You know, when I look at the mission of John Kerner with the sacking of Eva Herman had a look - the way a lot about the media in some primary taste - I found out that the term uniformity is a Nazi term. It is clear to me what is meant when it used more often this term in reference to Russian media. In Russia, however, you can absolutely hear opposing views on television.
  • question ... How do you explain that Kremlin critics like Vladimir Ryzhkov will not be invited into political programs and that viewers of the first channel to wonder why these channels do not criticizes Putin?
  • SE Kotenew: other day I listened in Wiesbaden at the most important Russian-German Petersburg Dialogue Forum Society one of our best presenters Vladimir Solovyov.
  • question ... an outspoken supporter of Putin's policy ...
  • SE Kotenev: He has lived in America and told his German colleagues when he returned from America, he would often American Journalists asked for his assessment of the situation. But the more he understood the situation in Russia, the less they asked him. "I was not more interesting," he said, "because I am in favor of Putin." German journalists complain because not speak Russian minister with them. So they go to Kasparov and any other Kremlin critics. But Solovyov said, with him all the ministers stood in line to be invited to his talk show. (Well, only from such programs can learn a lot about the current policy, not to mention the publications of the leading political scientists.)

And now once more a commentary on Press freedom in Russia: can

That you hear in Russia the opposite opinions and views, see and read, I have experienced. Only two times I met someone with whom I had also fought properly. Pros and cons Putin Putin is not compatible, and I look at the situation in 1998 and 1999 to the end of the Yeltsin era and could take Russia in 2006 and 2007 and the achievements of President Putin himself in appearances. But Germany also had a president like Putin - the company in Germany would not be divided, the "recovery" would not only be mere lie! Of course, I have extensively the shows on TV followed, if only by as much as possible to hear the Russian language, even by listening to his improved language skills, if during the day to deal only мямил и шепелявил (slurred speech). Mostly, the media, however, expressed positive about Putin - after all there is, as far as I can tell, no reason to comment negatively about him. In all areas, he has promoted Russia. We shall look also how much Russia was the end of the US-Yeltsin-time on the ground, this power of President Putin is so amazing and admirable, that it would be amazing to me as if someone would not recognize his achievements.

come to criticisms I still under the following part of the interview - about Anna Politkovskaya.

But here it comes to press freedom - and Global Politics is a weekly magazine, which deals mostly with politics. With the transformation of global politics as a blog in a regular weekly also this press organ is recorded normally. In regard to the censorship of the press, as it was prescribed for Germany in November 2001, I have deliberately chosen as an editor for the domiciliation of Global Politics in Moscow - Russia is a country of my knowledge of press freedom. I will not conceal

but the message that reached me yesterday with regard to http://www.tecchannel.de/schwerpunkt/Internet-Zensur.html a communication from Mr. Preuss of Reporters Without Borders:

From 04:02 .2008

outdoor writers and bloggers face penalties

Russia plans tighter Internet censorship

authoritarian Russia follows ruled states of Central Asia and will take strict censorship on the Internet. This could still turn out strict as for example in China.
"Currently, the Internet in Russia, fortunately, is relatively free. However, there is already a state agency, the warnings of when laws are violated," said the CIS officer Jakob Preuss Reporters Without Borders in conversation with pressrelease. In the future, not only access restrictions and government controls on home pages and e-mails out, but the mere visit of "forbidden" websites by the user is punishable.
A still secret, according to draft legislation, which is due at the time the committee for information policy in the Russian Senate, will surf freely especially on those home pages prevented which are located on the index.
"The Russian Prosecutor begins relatively quickly determined. This is especially the press and the law on extremism often arises," says Preuss. Comments in forums and blogs are also investigated. "This is also possible, for example, insults or Putin cartoons," it says of the experts.

The Russian media is generally of rigid state control through it. "A major problem in Internet censorship by the state will be the implementation of laws," said Preuss is optimistic. Many journalists, whose leaves or transmitting stations were directly affected by repression, have the Internet fled to express their views critical of the government further to the outside. "For the journalists of course it is good that this island still exist. The Internet is experiencing tremendous growth in Russia and finds not only in cities but also in the country becoming more widespread," says Preuss. The authors of that future remains uncertain for now.

from the state censorship and control of a necessary protection against extremism and terrorism and the fight against pornography and pedophilia are well founded. Apparently also called for the Russian Orthodox Church action. Critics counter again, that the proposed law does not protect against such threats could and see in the plans only further attempts to enforce uniformity of the media. "While there are still critical Russian newspapers. In most cases, these reach only a very limited basis, making the Internet more accessible to journalists is important," concludes Preuss. (Pte / hal)


course, I was alarmed, just where I still intend to publish this newspaper for freedom's sake in Russia - to love this very sentence read that the Патриарх всея Руси (the head of the Orthodox Church in Russia ) is involved in the censorship - it therefore therefore stands to reason that the censorship of pornography and pedophilia is directed, not against political enlightenment. Both dirt and moral depravity, I do not approve of and believe it can be a form of Zionist mind control the people amoral and aimless life cause. Of course, for me, Russia is a land of liberty and freedom of the press - and Germany as a land of freedom and press censorship.

However, further to the interview:

  • Cicero Question: Was the late Anna Politkovskaya a talented journalist?
  • SE Kotenew: It was definitely a passionate investigative journalist, has brought about their work constantly in danger. And because she was a critic of Putin, it has received for its life time, all kinds of prizes from Western media. Of course, the murder of her is terrible to her as a woman and as a mother yet. However, I was reading again murdered by a banker, the fifth in 2007. But the newspapers here write only about the journalists who are killed. Here, the murder of the banker is no less severe. Unfortunately, this situation is a sad side effect of the transformation stage, the closest Russian society.

this comment:

Had Mrs. Politkovskaya wrote for President Putin, they would have learned in the West no attention. It is unfortunate that they probably can not have the information readily available, where and when Ibn Al Khattab and Shamil Basayev through the training camp of the CIA and the ISI went to were as mercenaries for the war first in Afghanistan and then trained in Chechnya and Dagestan .

It honors them that it was the sorrow of the people in the war zones at heart so deeply touched, but would for the first Yeltsin and then-President Putin will leave this part of Russia, the U.S. and its mercenary terrorists? For quite unambiguously were both mercenaries worked for the U.S., were trained in Amir Muawia and Markaz-i-Dawar and Saudi Arabia (Bush family friend of Bin Laden) funded. Unfortunately, however, had

Anna Politkovskaya for "anti-Putin action 'their last task to fulfill - to be murdered on Putin's birthday. Made sense to her murder of Zionist Anglo-American perspective, if you look at the exact sequence of events. In April 2006 was held in Tomsk, the German-Russian business summit in the Russian, as well as from a German perspective, a resounding success. In September of that year stood at President Putin's visit with complete business delegation in Dresden on the St. Petersburg summit, should be avoided in the Anglo-American perspective, a renewed success at any price, it was about Germany and Russia to divide. President Putin's birthday and the day of his arrival in Dresden, then the talks were overshadowed by the St. Petersburg summit of the murder of Anna Politkovskaya - there was no further financial success more in Dresden. Anna Politkovskaya had met from the perspective of the Zionist cartel financial and power their mission.

And now the last part of the interview:

  • question you call your country open to modernity and the new. The same also says the designated presidential candidate, Dmitry Medvedev. What do you mean?
  • SE Kotenew: Yes, the 42-year-old Dmitry Medvedev is the new generation of politicians. Russia seeks in the future. We develop new technologies, we travel into space, we want security in this world to a new level. This also means openness to other cultures such as China and India. Finally, there is not just Hollywood.
  • question Hollywood?
  • SE Kotenew: sold in the 90 years we Americans big money for a lot of films from the third and fourth series of their productions. This soap opera is constantly looking at it in Russia. Now we have always demanding more of their own productions, Russian and of commercial film companies. But of course we do not live in isolation in this world. In Hollywood, playing Russian film actors, it calls them away, but now, sadly, that the Germans play in Hollywood the Nazis and the Russians, the Mafia.

The original of the interview without any explanatory comments is available at: http://www.cicero.de/97.php?ress_id=1&item=2338

Comment:

That in Russia is developing new technologies, interested citizens known. That these technologies not only to space or restrict the security technology, but even fewer people in the West. In medical technology, there are new exciting developments. And that Russia with President Putin and expected to incoming President Medvedev at the same time assistant for the good of the country by Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin of patriotic interest in Russia looks forward to an ever more positive development - if it is the malevolent Zionist Anglo-American financial and power- cartel admits - it is not to doubt. Russia had never attacked another country - but have to suffer attacks from foreign countries. Russia is left alone, so also Russia's neighbors have nothing to fear. Only the German Chancellor Merkel has destroyed the very good relations on the shameful. The Russian is a native of related peace-loving man.

From the German point of view it is certainly just as unfortunate - to be allowed to play in Hollywood, only the evil Nazis. Alone is the American-German film about the bombing of Dresden was the good, brave British and Americans, while the number was intentionally and specifically murdered civilians lying manipulated to 25,000 down - was still of Holocaust by the Western Allies deliberate mass murder of civilian German population. Only the Russian film about the Holocaust of Dresden tried to be objective - but with only 150,000 civilian victims are still far from reality, as it were well over 500,000 people in Dresden. Similarly, false reports, of course, Hollywood about Russia.

A pro-pos hypocritical - at the "moon landing" Hollywood had lied only on behalf of their own government - the moon landing was a commissioned work of Hollywood, a soap opera. Unfortunately, it is in Russia, as in Germany for a long time victim of the right kitschy Hollywood soap operas have become the pretend a fictional world and are part of the mind control.

It is time to wake up!

postscript,

HE Kotenew is of course as an ambassador of the Russian Federation in answering the interview questions to the so-called 'political correctness' bound. Them to hold me, I was not forced. As editor of 'policy-Global' I feel the truth and the comprehensive information required. Single issues require almost out separate articles - and I hope these items at the appropriate time to deliver yet.

© Rumpelstilz / Political Global / 10-2-2008

Friday, February 8, 2008

19 Have A Weak Bladder

presidential elections in Russia on 2 March

with update / Addendum of 14.2.2008 at the end of This article offers




Russia OSCE

entry on 20-2-2008




it rejects OSCE election monitoring for as late as


finds the presidential election in Russia only on 2 Held in March - two weeks of preparation time the OSCE had to actually meet. But what are the real reasons behind the rejection of the OSCE to observe elections?


The OSCE not guaranteed a regular The election process. This was already apparent in Kenya. And in elections in Georgia was the presence of OSCE observers, only the legalization of a sham election fraud, even weeks later protested against the citizens of Georgia, the U.S. Embassy in Tbilisi because of U.S. support for electoral fraud.


First, the election was certified by the OSCE in Georgia a regular routine. When it became public, however, that exit polls were held, which led the Auszählergebnis of 100% or more of the electorate ad absurdum, were reproduced in ballot totals percentages of 25% than 52% in Saakashvili - only then admitted hesitantly, the German - but only the German OSCE election observers that had occurred in the election irregularities. The election observers have certified the US-friendly countries full correctness of the election.

So WHAT is the OSCE?

The OSCE has proven to be particularly linked to U.S. interests, even as an instrument of U.S. propaganda - true to the motto: "Whose bread I eat ', whose song I sing." The OSCE, however, by no means guarantees the legitimacy of an election.

were taken in the light of these incidents, of which the U.S. president supported by electoral fraud in the office was, every time the OSCE to help. Now the Russian DUMA explained disappointed in the fact that the OSCE has canceled its presence in the presidential election in Russia.


Why this rejection of the OSCE?


One election to be held under observation by the OSCE can deny Western media hardly the legality - but when it is announced on the OSCE loudly, a vote had not taken place under proper conditions - or you have it even less entry permits. Only Russia has allowed the entry of the OSCE - two weeks before the election - and the OSCE election observation is rejected, because they would like to entered the country five days earlier. Two weeks, however, should suffice in each case to proceed to the spot - after traveling to Russia, not with the mule. Specious arguments are now used to talk about disability and to deny Russia the status of a civilized country.

Parliamentary Assembly of the Council
sent 30 observers to the Russian election

08 / 02 / 2008

MOSCOW, 08. February (RIA Novosti). The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council will appoint a presidential election in Russia, despite the boycott by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) 30 observers.

informed the head of the pre-electoral mission of the Parliamentary Assembly, Andreas Gross, on Friday at a press conference in Moscow. "We had received an invitation.

Then came the office of the Parliamentary Assembly of the decision to delegate to 30 experts to Russia. This decision is met," said Gross. The presidential election in Russia on 2 March this year instead.

In Russia, the press free than in Germany - and even the Russians are intent despite 70 years of dictatorship under socialism more on its democratic rights, as the lethargic accustomed to the German TV chair. Without complaint, the German accepted in 1989, when Kohl said in his televised speech August: "the Federal Republic must be gradually moving away from a high-wage, developed country and to develop towards a low-wage service economy" . In the chair in front of the television said the Germans, it would concern only the neighbors - but not himself today? Today with Hartz IV, and at best a forced labor to '1, 00 € 'hourly wage he is ashamed, still endures and keeps your tongue - The neighbor could learn so, what is really going on with him. Shall renounce the Germans also have to review the elections in Germany - and the eager officials refused at the election in Hesse, the observation of elections by the CCC due to introduction of computer voting machines that were rejected in Holland because of proven manipulation.


German! Stay in your chair sitting! Let you lie to by Merkel and Co. continue, it would go uphill with the economy and at some point you'll find a real job again - but while you're getting older and older - and the economy grows only in the export to abroad relocated jobs. Domestically, however, the economy is shrinking year by year. More than 10 (ten) million are already excluded from the labor force. Only believe continues to "free" elections in Germany. Not even the OSCE monitored the elections in Germany - and when the CCC will monitor an election with computer voting machines in Germany, they will be charged against the election observers criminal complaint for obstructing the election (fake?). The case was on record in the Hessen-election in Obertshausen.


voting machines were used in the U.S. to manipulate the presidential elections (recorded cases in the states of Florida and Ohio). But apparently in the USA civilized country (like Germany) so we need not legitimize the OSCE. So the OSCE force is only a theatrical troupe.


Russians - and Georgians - are much more alert Democrats. Exit Polls organize their own, they monitor their own elections A country like the former Soviet Union, was abolished in a democracy for many decades, has led to an awakening of democratic understanding. There is hardly anyone sitting in the recliner. In Russia, the local president of the country has returned to real economy forward. The unemployment rate in Moscow is about 1% (one percent) and wages and salaries increasing continuously and rapidly. Gone are the Russian workers who people in Turkey, the hotels and beaches - and the rich Russians buy their homes in Mabea or Baden-Baden.


The US-dominated countries, Russia to talk democracy but from them is not safe, that a president due to his successes in the consent of the population that is over 70%. The nominated candidate for election in Russia, Medvedev is now up to the top of the head of state-owned company Gazprom and is recommended by President Putin, as his crown prince, his preferred candidate. In polls, he reached a consent by almost 80%! So WHAT OSCE wants to check it? Whether he now unites 76, 78, 80 or 82% of the vote about?




condemn Council of Europe parliamentarians
presidential election in Russia already unjust


08 / 02 / 2008 MOSCOW
08 February (RIA Novosti). The upcoming presidential election in Russia can hardly be described as fair, according to the electoral mission of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council.

"This choice does not equal conditions for contestants to create ... an election in the front of the candidates during their registration almost insurmountable obstacles piled up can not be considered a free choice ", explained the mission of their prognosis.

vote, are not in the set for all participants a level playing field, can not be regarded as fair, said in a statement published on Friday in Moscow of the mission. The Council of Europe experts have stayed on 6 to 8 February for a visit to Moscow.


is of course unfair choice ! None of the other candidates may, in its government tandem to similar successes point, as the tandem Medvedev / Putin. But perhaps the parliamentarians would have preferred a mud fight in the U.S., where neither Obama nor Clinton nor McCain will lead the country, but the Council on Foreign Relations and David Rockefeller with him. Him the next President of the United States must obey. Machiavelli is this system about ready to combat the growing poverty in the U.S.?



Medvedev is 42 years old, stood before the largest companies of Russia, is regarded as economically liberal - was not part of the state power structures (such as the secret service - although the expertise and knowledge in this area of its governance has proved to President Putin as the country had to be useful). Medvedev as a candidate can be expected that the country will develop step by step into a real democracy (democracy and freedom as the FRG).










President Putin has outlined the lines 2020

Quote RIA Novosti:



Russia: Putin Outgoing Präsidet
Enwicklungsstrategie outlines of the country by 2020


WASHINGTON 08 February (RIA Novosti). Russian President Vladimir Putin, who in May after eight years, has resigned his position on Friday called for the development of a new security and economic strategy of the country.

"For the consolidation of national security is a new strategy for the development of the armed forces needed by the year 2020," he said in an enlarged session of the State Council, in which the concept of development of Russia has been treated for the next twelve years. Russia should not, however, can provoke an arms race that would invalidate it, the head of state.

Raw material scenario has said no future

Putin that Russia, innovations for the only possible alternative to the raw material scenario.
"The strategy of innovative development of the country based on human potential, on the effective application of knowledge and skills of the people," Putin said at the meeting.

golden age for Russia's economy

Putin said to expect a golden age for Russia's economy.
The Russian economy is compared to the end of the 90's improved markedly and is now one of the seven leading economies in the world.

"In the past eight years pushed the accumulated foreign investments into the Russian economy to a seven-fold. In the previous period was pure capital outflow each year ten to 20 and sometimes 25 billion U.S. dollars," said Putin.



Putin pointed out that the inflow of capital today, a record amount of was recorded 82.3 billion U.S. dollars.

According to Putin, the capitalization of the Russian market fell by the 22-fold to over 1999.
"The scope of Russia's gross domestic product reached 1.33 trillion rubles last year (one euro equals 36 rubles). . When this indicator Russia, Mexico, Brazil and South Korea ahead, "the president

Putin said, according to Russia must continue around the world offer the most attractive
living standards

problem. Low labor productivity

Russia must, according to Putin in 2020 increase, however, the
labor productivity four-fold.

"In need of twelve years in the key sectors at least be a
fourfold increase this Eckziffer achieved," he said.

lies in the labor productivity Russia behind the rest of
still far behind, said Putin. "The main problem the Russian economy is their clear
strong inefficiency, "the president said.

According to the Russian Economy Ministry, the growth rate of labor productivity is currently in Russia by about 66 percent behind the growth in wages.

reduce the tax burden necessary

Putin has also called for a uniform and as low
VAT.
According to him, has simplified the tax system and the possibility of arbitrary interpretation of the law can be minimized.

State economic sector is about the forces of the country

Putin has spoken for the reduction of the state sector in the Russian economy and for the active mobilization of private investment.

"Such a large state sector is on Russia's forces," he said
in the session.

no compromise of the West in conflict
CFE

miss at its Western partners, Russia, Putin, real
steps of efforts to find a compromise to the Treaty on
Conventional Forces in Europe (CFE Contract testify) would.

"We are virtually forced to counter-steps," he said.

Russia come for decades the international obligations to strictly
said Putin continued. "We meet all international
agreements, including the security sector, as well as the
international agreements, in particular the Treaty on arms control in Europe
- the CFE treaty," the President said.

"Our partners in the North Atlantic Treaty have ratified a number of documents not
and meet them not, while they demand of us another
unilateral performance," said Putin.

With political rights of the people made final

During his tenure, "with the political rights of
people end made, "noted Putin. The practice of decision-making
to a dictation of monopolies, oligarch groups, media magnates and
unbridled populists could be overcome.

country is united

also could separatism Russian regions will be overcome,
the President. Eight years ago had some regions positioned as sovereign
States "were associated with the Russian Federation only.
were in most parts of the Federation laws that contradicted the Russian
Constitution.

"Now separatism has receded, while terrorism
decisive and crushing blows were mixed, "said Putin.

not act to the detriment of Russia

Putin stressed that Russian society under the principle
" Nothing should, to the detriment of Russia and its citizens to act. "

"Irresponsible demagogy and attempts to divide society
and in the context of domestic political struggle foreign aid and intervention use
are not only immoral but also illegal," the
President.

Putin may be the most likely Implement reforms itself
:
He agreed to to assume the post of prime minister, should
the first Russian deputy prime minister and presidential candidate Dmitry Medvedev
the election on 2 March win.


I as a German writer of the article Russia a little bit familiar and the rapid progress of Russia - progress in every respect - could watch with my own eyes, I am firmly convinced that the tandem of future President Medvedev and Prime Minister Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin of the future will continue to make the best for Russia.


Russia does not need OSCE


Russia needs for its OSCE election not alone even if the Duma, as the disappointed that the Russian Parliament on the OSCE cancellation. Either way will be collected by the U.S. and after the elections in Russia, a hue and cry and cry. Just at this nagging unauthorized charges is what the cancellation of the OSCE, the elections in Russia give the stamp of legitimacy. The election itself is a mere formality - as long as just over 75% of the population for the candidate is Medvedev.

The OSCE theater is nothing other than a U.S. think-tanks thought out program to Russia in the Rockefeller Foundation-dominated western media Add as undemocratic place (there are only very rare, isolated free press publishers in the West - while in Russia, as the 'Mirror' found more than 35% of the press is FREE!). So let us calmly through the propaganda wave that threatens to sweep over the West against Russia - there is nothing but propaganda!

include this propaganda scenarios such as a Russian upgrade - this upgrade to the U.S. and NATO to build up just as the U.S. around Russia missile (the oil of Iraq seems the United States not to comply - they also want to Oil of Russia), the former Soviet Union was dismantled into its component parts Russia and has only over the territory of the Russian Federation - but even that is the USA still too much, they intend to Russia again in five (5) separate states break down - along the lines of "divide and rule". However, not everything the U.S. puppet President Yeltsin in Russia, but President Putin has stabilized the country again and taken to a new upswing. discredit

New scenarios for Russia, seem to also build with Ukraine. Here, the Ukraine moved into gas, which it has not paid. The debt now totals $ 1.5 billion, ie more than 1 billion €. Ukraine, in the case of non-payment a further supply fails. It is likely that Ukraine is stealing turn the gas - as early as two years ago when the then U.S. propaganda machine, the press and MPs to purchased, brought Russia to pass off as unreliable suppliers. In reality, however, the U.S. was behind the theft of gas and thus the less amount of gas arriving in Western Europe. But the German notes at all, what is the truth?

we waiting from which the next steps are the Rockefeller-think-tank, but since the Rockefeller and Rothschild could not get the Siberian oil fields via the intermediary Chodorkovski lead, the U.S. propaganda war against a continuous Russia and the Russian government. Here, the OSCE theater is just one of the means to move here over Russia. But as long as the Western propaganda press still maintains a shred of credibility?

Who wants to find comprehensive gets - I believe - impartiality news about the German, to write news agency RIA Novosti:

http://de.rian.ru/

addendum of 14.2. 2008

On the occasion of today's press conference by President Putin published by RIA Novosti about other news and opinion President Putin the OSCE, in which he criticized the West and the OSCE sharply.

Perhaps, in my view, therefore, the free press in Russia, because decisions in Russia follow the logic - and it is enough, "to act for the good of the country 'under the premise of easy to think logically. Now might be possible to assert that it was presumptuous of me, as editor of Policy-Global to announce that Russia has not to worry about an OSCE, the Duma had not come because of the refusal of the OSCE to Russia, to show concern - but it simply corresponds to the logic.

For this reason I am particularly pleased today, following news of RIA Novosti To read about the press conference of President Putin:

Putin: OSCE reform ripe for a long time

Russia will not allow anyone to him
impose the conditions under which it no signature has set
and will still meet all the obligations taken on. The president of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin at his annual press conference in the Kremlin
made clear by the question regarding the refusal
of the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) and Parliamentary Assembly delegate to the OSCE, its representative to
presidential election in Russia, answered.

"The OSCE's reform ripe for a long time," said
Putin, adding that "Russia in the framework of this European
structures commitments will be fulfilled in full, while the OSCE structures out the modalities
try to impose. "

is a fact that in the decades after the 2nd World War II, a variety of
NGOs were established. Many of them were organizations for the stabilization of the Western system, others were based on private initiatives (such as Greenpeace, Amnesty International, and many others) who owed their foundation to the idealism of its founders. But they are all one and all through the financial sponsorship in the most positive case gone blind in one eye - namely, the eye of Western interests, the eye of the power expansion in favor of an Anglo-American hegemony. With direct participation by members of the IRC, however, these organizations paramilitary agents of the monstrous financial interests of a few clans of the 'One World Government' become.


Granted, coming into a market-based world order even the most positive and most idealistic Organizations with no unused contributions or sponsorship from without, because everything costs money, but idealism many activities makes it all possible. The conscience, however, should never be for sale - and this accusation is aimed at organizations participating in the OSCE as well as on the hacks in the mainstream press.


© Rumpelstilz Political Global Supplement dated 8-2-2008 and 14-2-2008

Saturday, February 2, 2008

Supplement For Stenosis

America's presidential election - the end of NATO?

.


no solidarity in NATO?

A vital question?


Before Desolidarisierung NATO warns of a certain Mr. Winter Süddeutsche Newspaper, commenting on 02/02/2008. He warns of a break-up of NATO when the German army who fought not on the side of Americans in the aggressive war in Afghanistan, and mittötet mitstirbt. Recall that the end of December 1979 was asked to Russia from Kabul by the then government for help to connect the radical Islamization contrary. Under the former government in Kabul were girls going to school, were allowed to study, were allowed to work as doctors - in short, the country developed in the sense of a humane society. To secure the modernized Afghanistan Russia sent its army to the assistance in support of the local government against insurgent radical Islamists.

In the world of a sham of the same group of people ultra rich financial masters staged 'Cold War' was the Soviet Union's fall, but the Soviet Union was rich in mineral resources, oil and gas - rose and the USSR as a opposite block of A World Government through. There was also a difference between Rothschild and Rockefeller, and Rockefeller was the U.S. domination, while Rothschild indulged nor the domination of the USSR by the Khazar Jews. The Rothschilds had stolen the deposits of the royal family in the Rothschild Bank of England and just sat in the postponement of asylum for the royal family until it by the October coup (called Revolution) by their Khazar Jews, Leon Trotsky (real - Jewish - names Bronstein, was married to Mrs. Schiff, daughter of the Khazar Bankers * ship, which was again married to the Rothschilds). With the revolution and the murder of the Tsar of the treasure disappeared in Rothschild's vaults. (* Ship was involved in the implantation Rothschilds in the United States and also in the establishment of privately become Federal Reserve / FED, so the dollar is nurmehr a private debt for which'd have to stick the U.S. taxpayers - but at the level of debt can no longer adhere). The Rothschilds, like the Rockefellers, both are Jews.


Which president is on the U.S.

and thus determine the NATO?



Until now, however, lead in the qualifying heats in the U.S. Senator John McCain on the Republican side. Who hopes that the Democrats need peace, not more likely to Kucinich, he has withdrawn his candidacy for lack of success. With the Democrats now Hillary Clinton is ahead.


Senator John McCain Rep.

And if a hawk in the United States of Camp of the Republicans should win the election - one John McCain, who in 2006 promoted to the Munich Wehrkundetagung abusive rushing against everything non-American military buildup and war, thereby herumgeiferte especially against President Putin and accused him of confrontation search against the "peace-loving" Americans where it is the USA now, the lead continuously wars of aggression to occupy foreign countries to carry out coups and assassinations can order or perform for yourself. McCain may be described using tie easily as a criminal fanatics that deals with Hitler, Pol Pot or Bush is in good company.

now to Senator John McCain. Senator John McCain is the favorite senator of the neocons. His foreign policy chief adviser Randy Scheunemann is a board member of the PNAC. McCain's foreign policy advisers include such prominent neocons like Kristol's colleagues from the PNAC Robert Kagan, former CIA Director James Woolsey (a signatory to several open letters of PNAC, sees Woolsey's "war on terror" as Podhoretz as "World War IV" ), and Max Boot (staff of the Weekly Standard and a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations).

Senator McCain can, like Wesley Clark, Bob und Elisabeth Dole, ihren Wahlkamp von der Albanischen Mafia bezahlen.

Zu seinen weiteren Beratern gehören:
Richard Lee Armitage , President George W. Bush’s deputy secretary of state and an international business consultant and lobbyist, informal foreign policy adviser
Gen. Alexander M. Haig, Jr., President Reagan’s secretary of state, endorsed McCain April 10
Robert Kagan; senior associate with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington Post columnist and former speechwriter for then-secretary of state

George P. Shultz; informal foreign policy adviser
Henry A. Kissinger, President Nixon and President Ford’s secretary of state who met McCain in Vietnam and is now a consultant, informal adviser

Col. Andrew F. Krepinevich, president of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, briefed McCain as well as Sen. Hillary Clinton and Gov. Bill Richardson
William Kristol, The Weekly Standard editor, informal foreign policy adviser
Robert "Bud" McFarlane, President Reagan’s national security adviser and now a principal with Energy & Communications Solutions, energy and national security adviser
James R. Schlesinger, President Nixon and President Ford’s secretary of defense, energy and national security adviser
Randy Scheunemann, national security aide to then-Senate Majority Leaders Bob Dole and Trent Lott and now a lobbyist, defense and foreign policy coordinator (for this cycle and 2000)
Gary Schmitt, former staff director of the Senate Intelligence Committee and now an American Enterprise Institute scholar, foreign policy adviser
Lt. Gen. Brent Scowcroft, national security adviser to Presidents Ford and George H.W. Bush and founder of business consultancy the Scowcroft Group, adviser
R. James Woolsey, former CIA director and now a vice president at consulting company Booz Allen Hamilton, energy and national security adviser
- - - just to name a few.


While President Bush still warns a world war must be avoided, longs Podhoretz brought about the hour when he finally fought openly and without restraint. Let others against the term "warmonger defend" - Podhoretz stands apart from such ridiculous notions of honor for him. He lives out of a sense of strength, which has always been alarmed at the "cowardly liberals gutted." He sees the horror in the eyes of his opposite number as proof that he's right. And it shall always continue: his recent essay "Arguments for the bombing of Iran" (Commentary, June 2007) ends with the words, he pray "as Americans and as a Jew with all my heart for it," that President Bush "will do it." Before Ahmadinejad's visit to New York Podhoretz did in several interviews to know that he was sure that President Bush will bomb Iran before the end of his term. And on television, he said, "If we bomb Iran - and I hope and pray that we do it - this will trigger a wave of anti-Americanism, against the anti-Americanism we've endured until now, will be a love feast. "In Podhoretz's logic this would also re just another sign that the victory in Fourth world war is approaching. For more anti-Americanism can only mean that America is more than ever does the right thing.


no less dangerous, however, Hillary Clinton


If, however, from the camp of Hillary Clinton as some Democrates close ally of Lieberman and Co. , a no less kriegstreberischem Zionists should win the election, leading the United States not only continued their colonial wars, but will still start new wars. Also significant is the life of Hillary Clinton, whose husband in cocaine shipments across the state Arkansas was involved, or the war against Yugoslavia began, or even shot down in whose reign the Russian submarine Kursk with a torpedo MK-48 was what brought the world to the brink of 3.Weltkrieges. In their lawyer Hillary Clinton was involved in a number of dubious transactions .




Hillary Clinton - is the choice-candidate

of the military-industrial complex

Naive minds might think would be under a President Hillary Clinton is a fundamental change U.S. foreign policy give. Among the foreign policy advisers The senator, however, are three of the responsibility for the Kosovo war: Madeleine Albright, the Vice Secretary of State Strobe Talbott, and Richard Holbrooke, who met with Bush's predecessor important diplomatic assignments.

Both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama differ only in rhetoric and tactical issues of the foreign policy of the Bush junta. Among the presidential candidates of the Democrats and Republicans, there are only three Kanidaten that represent a real rather than a simulated policy change: the Republicans, it is the Texas Congressman Ron Paul (a Libertarian), are the Democrats it is the former Senator Mike Gravel and Congressman from Ohio, Dennis Kucinich (both honest left-liberal, but who have now withdrawn their candidacy). All three are added in their parties and are no longer underdogs in Rennen.Hillary Clinton get so far by all candidates, most donations from individuals of the arms industry (which has traditionally preferred Republican Kanidaten).


The war criminal Wesley Clark is listed as a possible candidate for the vice presidency.

The main supporter of Hillary Clinton are found in the military-industrial complex, such as:

Boeing
Enslavement
General Dynamics
Hillary Clinton for President
Lockheed Martin Northrop Grumman Corporation

Raytheon
Republican Party
Spotlight
U.S. arms industry
Wall Street's favorite
War Machine

In addition, it supports from Wall Street as well as also from the investment bankers. After her election to the Senate, she became the first New York senator, their hawk-existence with the support of the invasion in Iraq revealed, and their position regarding Iran, the most warlike of all presidential candidates - across all political groups, whether Republicans or Democrates.

The arms industry has its tough stance already rewarded with the fact that she supports Hillary Clinton and not with the traditional allies, the Republican John McCain.
According to Washington Post, 2.10.2007 belong to the supporters of Hillary Clinton:


Madeleine K. Albright, President Clinton 's secretary of state and now chairperson of the National Democratic Institute, foreign policy adviser
Gen. Wesley K. Clark, President Clinton’s Kosovo commander and now a Democratic fundraiser, endorsed Sen. Clinton Sept. 15
Lee Feinstein, a deputy in President Clinton’s State Department, national security coordinator
Leslie H. Gelb; president emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations, a former New York Times correspondent and a former State and Defense Department official, informal adviser
Richard C. Holbrooke, President Clinton’s UN ambassador and broker of the Dayton Peace Accords (and now a Washington Post columnist), foreign policy adviser
Martin S. Indyk, President Clinton’s ambassador to Israel and now director of Brookings’s Saban Center for Middle East Policy, foreign policy adviser
Gen. John M. ("Jack") Keane, a former Army vice chief of staff who co-crafted the Iraq "surge" and is now a military analyst (sometimes for ABC news), military issues adviser
Andrew Shapiro, Sen. Clinton’s Senate foreign policy staffer
Former Amb. Joseph C. Wilson IV, the half of the Plamegate couple who criticized the administration for using questionable evidence to promote the Iraq war, endorsed Sen. Clinton July 16
--- um nur einige zu nennen.



Clinton, like McCain, only the different parties that are in the spirit of Machiavelli (Rockefeller) to run one way or the Rockefeller policy.


If so carry David Rockefeller (right photo) on the side of the Republicans Senator John McCain or Hillary Clinton side of the Democrates to power then the wars in number , as well as increasing its scope in almost incalculable number. All these wars are started by the United States do not serve any hypothetical "democratization," but only the subjugation of foreign countries on the The aim of the one-world government to come closer. But since Russia as the main opponents of this one-world government, against the submission of this Zionist Anglo-American financial and power-cartel fights and as an independent country following national but peaceful interests that make the hawks in the U.S. and a war against Russia be expected. This was also the official journal of the Rockefeller subordinate 'Council on Foreign Relations' named "Foreign Affairs" published in the March / April 2006 by was then required to start a nuclear first strike against the long-free and private Russian Federation . Only under this premise makes the deployment of U.S. missiles in Poland from the U.S. perspective makes sense, because it draws Poland the first pre-emptive Russian rocket from the moment the radar tracking of a U.S. first strike on himself. The U.S., the Poles not matter - what matters is one's own benefit. This financial and power cartel has built long ago for the taxpayers' money safe shelter for 500 to 1000 m depth. That suffer only the general population will be.


solidarity within NATO?

Who says Nato should know that this is not a solidarity Defence Pact, but a focus on armament and wars of aggression under the organization Command of the United States, which in turn is under the command of the Rockefeller clan. Rockefeller is not only 100% supreme head of the CIA, but the top leader of the entire United States. Thus, the NATO under the current de Hoop Sheffer nothing more than a military organization of the private financial interests.

If today was to Robert Gates, U.S. navy minister and now also by de Hoop Sheffer is required as supreme warlord of NATO, the Federal Republic and the armed forces show solidarity and initially even German soldiers as combat troops to Afghanistan in the embattled southern provinces send, it's about even Germany again in the liability for an aggressive war and murder are increasing. Apart from the fact that it is just a beginning should be made to Germany again to engage in a war, the war in Afghanistan is - as described in the preliminary report on the NATO - a war with all the brutality and murderous treachery on the part of the United States against the Afghan population is kept.

Afghanistan was to the end of Soviet assistance a peacefully developing country - but not part of U.S. hegemony. To under Brzezinski's Geopolitical Chess Games, the USSR from the south to attack and dissolve into their constituents, the CIA began standing under the Rockefeller of the order with the help of the Pakistani ISI to train mercenaries, which included not just Ibn Al Khattab, Shamil Basayev, and Osama Bin Laden and the Taliban to fight as terrorists against the Soviet Union. This aspiration to CIA-trained mercenaries, including urging war material (Stinger missiles) to Pakistan after Afghanistan ago.

With the withdrawal of Soviet troops from Afghanistan in mid-May 1988 (under Gorbachev, the longest of Masonic lodges was pro-Western influence), Afghanistan was also pronounced Islamist. Afghanistan was also with their local warlords, whose territory was fully grown opium and still today, the British BEIC British East-Indian Company (the Queen and 300 families belonging to the English aristocracy) supplies of opium and heroin. However, the Taliban established their regime in Afghanistan. Part of these mercenary terrorists, Shamil Basayev and Ibn Al Khattab were then sent by the U.S. on the war in Chechnya and Dagestan to in order to continue the war against Russia. These mercenaries were in the truest sense of the word purely mercenary terrorists - to conduct on behalf of the United States in Russia compared to the local government war.

meantime, however, the tide had turned. The main mercenary terrorists, which should result in Chechen war for the United States were turned back by Russian forces and eventually they fell in battle. The Chechen war the U.S. has not won.

The report from Dick Cheney about the global supply situation for crude oil, the report of March 2001, the "Cheney Energy Task Force 'to Bush not only had the approval of GW Bush to the destruction of the WTC on 9 / 11 as a home-made war a matter of consequence, but was also planning to attack the war in Afghanistan mature. Afghanistan was a key country for access to the Rockefeller oil and gas countries Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan - a pipeline by Halliburton / KBR (belonging to Dick Cheney) to relocate to the Indian Ocean, without going through Russian territory. Osama Bin Laden was never an opponent of the U.S. or the Bush family, the bin Ladens are On the contrary, a close friend of the Bushes and also helped co-fund the war in Chechnya. Significantly, this is the whole of the CIA fake video of Osama bin Laden. Here, the work of the CIA forgers will always amateurish. Only the Taliban had the time since 1988, ie after deduction of the Russian armed forces used up to 2002, all advances (debt education for women, development of the country) cancel out and established their Islamist radical religious power.

have in this country, which was previously made by the U.S. destroyed, where a radical Islamist structure could be established only with the help of the U.S. (after all, the U.S. wanted mercenaries against Russia, which also flown by the CIA in Kosovo, were there to fight alongside the KLA against Yugoslavia for U.S. interests) is now entering the U.S. wanted to secure its oil deliveries from the South-Soviet republics with their military machine. On the surface, was staged by the CIA and the Mossad 9 / 11 an excuse to invade the land of Afghanistan, ostensibly to look for terrorists, which they had formed themselves. Only one Taliban fighter had no reason to fight outside of Afghanistan - unless they were paid accordingly. However, Taliban, as religiously convinced not willing to put their land to the American way of life available. The pipeline has been built yet so far - the only profit of the Anglo-American financial and power cartel is currently in opium production and the exorbitant profits from heroin for the English aristocracy and established family clans in the United States. Of course, not an English Lord or Earl is even on the dark street corner and dealing out heroin - that they have long since established their criminal structures, which make for the "high and mighty" hands dirty. should

dirty now also the hands of German soldiers in which they spread on the side of the colonial fighters of Terror in the civilian population in the southern provinces . Who then is Taliban freedom fighters? Every fighter who fights for freedom from foreign occupation in his own country, can probably hardly be called a terrorist. Terrorist is but one who can think of attacking a foreign country. And the U.S. is fighting troops and bombings occurred in Afghanistan and now wonder why the population is still going on against U.S. soldiers. Afghans are perhaps a little bolder than German, which allow implicitly still the presence of U.S. soldiers in Germany.

On the contrary, in Germany under the command of NATO, the Bundeswehr, the German generals command generator, the NATO command. . . and NATO was in turn reports to the U.S. and therefore Rockefeller, as well as the German Chancellor Merkel in Germany used by Rockefeller. who still believes in a free election in Germany, is naive - but this deserves a separate detailed investigation and a separate article. It's not about what the Germans drummed on media propaganda, it is about the non-public background information that may not know the German. NATO has evolved from a so-called peace-alliance during the chimera of the 'Cold War' has long since developed an aggressive war on trimmed terrorist organization under the command of the U.S.. The U.S. puppet de Hoop Sheffer calls even in the German 'Bild am Sonntag' (v. 3.2.2008) combat operations alongside the U.S. against terrorists in Afghanistan.


German Defence Minister Walter Steinmeier stressed that was the actual task of NATO, to secure the peace. While it has been dissolved under Gorbachev, the Warsaw Pact, withdrew the Russian army from the satellite states of Bulgaria through Romania, Hungary, Czechoslovakia and Poland and the U.S. commitment and the commitment of the former German Defense Minister Woerner familiar to peace - after drove the from the U.S. neocon camp dating Jackson, these commitments and drove the eastward expansion of NATO against all promise ahead - now U.S. soldiers are in Romania and the former Soviet Republic of Georgia and at times even in the former Soviet Republic of Ukraine, where now the set up by the U.S. puppet Yushchenko advises public on how the popular resistance against a NATO membership of Ukraine may be deceived.






Wehrkunde meeting in February in Munich




Now that February is the beginning of the next security conference in Munich. Two years ago, rushed PRO WAR U.S. Senator McCain on the Wehrkundetagung Munich against Russia and President Putin's policy, where long ago put the population as well as the government on economic development in peace and freedom value. For too long the people had in the former Soviet Union suffered from the Rockefeller clan to power hoisted Khazar Jews (Trotsky, Lenin, Bolsheviks) socialism with all its privations. Russians love peace, and economic and social recovery in Russia, her life at the weekend at the dacha - but they are not ready to submit again to a foreign dictatorship that builds threateningly at their borders (eg, missile deployment in Poland, NATO Ukraine's accession).

Who Today the question is whether German soldiers should jointly with the U.S. war on terror war of occupation in foreign lands - only to express solidarity with the U.S. to terrorists, should go a long with himself in court. The example of U.S. terrorism in Iraq (who did not have weapons of mass destruction - but on crude oil) with the mass murders, which is inferior to a Holocaust at Auschwitz in anything, one the Iraqis imposed war with now well over a MILLION victims , it should The images can never forget, there are no soldiers, there are civilians, people like you and I, who hoped to live.

For peace must be decided and used vigorously. Security is not created by weapons but by trust. To date, however, destroy the United States all trust. Instead, as promised, in return for the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact and NATO to dissolve or at least not via the inner German border also continues to expand in the East, the U.S. has operated in breach of promise and are now pursuing a policy to provoke war.

It needs no more picture from Vietnam of Mylai, the little girl burned by napalm - and other atrocities by U.S. terrorists - the atrocities that the U.S. is always commit again now too!





The decision may only be:
no solidarity with the
terrorist state USA!

immediate dissolution of NATO!


© Rumpelstilz / Political Global / 02/02/2008