The harsh criticism of President Putin
proves to be brainwashed
HE the Ambassador of the Russian Federation Vladimir Kotenev expressed in a Interview with the Journal Cicero about the image, which is distributed in the West about Russia and President Putin. This is the position of Ambassador perfectly understandable, provided you have the reader already has extensive background knowledge. In the weekly policy-Global we are aware, however, that the German on the background to having just can not, it was essential parts in the daily reporting deprived and sometimes even distorted part of history by omission distorts - quite simply, the media play the citizen "blind cow".
As the author This annotated interviews of the Ambassador of the Russian Federation and at the same time as a German, I have critically followed monitored the development in Germany and I am Russia through a number of longer visits and familiar work in Russia, so I try by commenting on the interview knowledge gaps among Germans close to help in a more objective opinion about Russia. Disturb me quite simply the gross and outrageous lies, such as are common in German media about Russia, even if it is known, were produced in which think tanks these fairy tales. Truly free journalists in Germany lose their jobs and remain permanently excluded. The Frankfurter Allgemeine even published in November 2001 a half-page article entitled: "We say goodbye to the free reporting" . As the web-based weekly magazine, we feel, and I are not obligated to censor the press. Free information and truth we believe to be one of the fundamental basic rights of every citizen.
The author of this article, I am son of a German since urdenkbaren generations of family who went into the Federal Republic in the American zone for the school, had graduated with English and French, with one-notes are Abi - that is a typical Wessi, but with many years of international experience in Anglophone and Francophone countries for a U.S. employer, I certainly know no East German opinion. However, I was stubborn enough, not long enough to let me impose any opinion - I preferred to search an open mind, make me my own picture - and here I share with my comments in the interview of the Ambassador of Russia.
Interview with Ambassador Vladimir Kotenew
- question: Did the German media a fixed image of Russia?
- SE Kotenew: you meet here at the same number of media stereotypes. I've just in a national daily newspaper an article on former Chancellor Gerhard Schröder read. The journalist wrote, Mr. Schroeder worked for Gazprom, Gazprom is in turn a State-controlled monster, and the state is being waged by the "KGB-man Putin. Will be made to believe so, because everything was KGB, along with Gerhard Schröder? Mr. Schroeder does not work in Gazprom. He is merely the chairman of the supervisory board of a consortium, made up of four companies, two German, one Dutch and Gazprom.
- question ... the majority shareholder.
- SE Kotenew: But first time as Mr Schröder before an international consortium that is building a gas pipeline from Russia to Germany. This North European gas pipeline is of vital importance for energy supply in Europe, a project that has endorsed the European Commission many years ago. Its then President Romano Prodi had asked our President Vladimir Putin even on the line. This is commonly known in Russia, only the Germans do not know.
- question you can not understand the concern of Poland and the Baltic states?
- SE Kotenew: know there are especially overseas, but also in Germany a number of think tanks. Journalists like to talk about facts here. But the decisive factor is, where do these facts. There are absolute truths: Mr X was born in Y. And then there is no confirmed information, and if not confirmed, then they usually disappear a day later. And there is widespread targeted information that is there to provoke any other information. Between all this information must find their way around the journalist.
comment Rumpelstilz:
The theme of former Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder, President Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin and the gas pipeline and the truth in the background
This issue requires a detour to the Chancellor Kohl and the presence of former U.S. Ambassador to Bonn and former CIA Deputy Director Vernon Walters, the latter being a serious effect on the design of the Federal Republic of influence. In Kohl, Helmut suddenly went the only major oil companies ARAL and DEA in the hands of BP Amoco and Shell. Thus, Germany had lost its autonomy abruptly in oil supply, was delivered at the mercy of the executive suites of the Anglo-American financial and power cartel, the occupation of Germany was extended from the military sector to the energy sector.
The challenge for Former Chancellor Schröder, the question of how Germany could be freed from the influence of the Anglo-American financial and power cartel. With increasingly installed gas heaters Germany was blackmailed by a supply stop by the companies BP Amoco and Shell and existing gas pipelines through Ukraine and Poland, American country ruled up to 100%. Russia, however, had been due to reliable deliveries during the past 30 years demonstrate trustworthiness - irrespective of its form of government in Russia, because addiction is always two sides - Germany needs oil and gas, Russia needs foreign exchange.
Since 2001, examined the various routes for pipelines. The analogy of Poland to the U.S. hegemony remained only nor the gas pipeline through Ukraine, but also led there, the last piece of the pipeline through Poland. With the USA in Ukraine staged orange "revolution" but also the Ukraine was unsafe to cantonists. Thus, the final choice was the project of Nord Stream pipeline, routing through the Baltic Sea, bypassing all the countries under U.S. domination.
The serious negotiations on the Baltic Sea route of the gas pipeline will be at the Bilderberg conference in Germany in 2005 to that of David Rockefeller set up by the former CIA http://www.zeit-fragen.ch/ausgaben/ 2007/nr2-vom-1512007/angela-merkel-eine-neokonservative-als-% 20praesidentin-the-european-union / FDJ propagandist Angela Merkel, the step by step under Kohl all obstacles and competitors were out of the way., Submitted the proposal to be Chancellor. The CIA is an organization that is 100% under the orders of the Rockefellers. The Chancellor Merkel was under-commitment to its promise to prevent any form of democracy in Germany and referendum and Germany to bring under the dominance of EU government - that is to extinguish an independent, self-determined Germany for good.
After David Rockefeller, the Merkel had taken to task could, surprisingly Gerhard Schröder, "voluntary" early Convene new elections. Each still be in Germany's closer ties with Russia in mind a long tradition of ties between Germany and Russia (even a German was much beloved czarina in Russia!) Should be avoided at all costs would have, but an alliance of Germany and Russia, the dominance by the oppose Anglo-American financial power and anti-trust (as the world government) even more efficiently. By then, the necessary cables were not brought fundamental agreements in the era of Chancellor Schroeder's conclusion. Volkswagen decided to build a plant in Kaluga and RWE and BASF concluded the contract with Gazprom to build the Nord Stream pipeline under the Baltic Sea - just 10 days before the early elections in Germany. Also, RWE took over Ruhrgas in Gazprom. This will complete the gas pipeline with Germany relating to gas supplies not be blackmailed - Schroeder and Putin have done the trick to avoid the possible blackmail Germany by the Anglo-American financial and power cartel.
With the announcement of the signing of the Treaty set up a hue and cry and cry on the part of the Baltic (US-governed) countries and (the US-dominated) of Poland, has been chastened by this Treaty, the Vernon reached Walters on coal dependence through the "sale" of Aral and DEA destroyed. The low response in Germany to the clamor and lamentations of Poland and the Baltic countries and forced Rockefeller to the United States to concoct in their think tanks, a new strategy ... the "supply uncertainty"!
order not to be hindered on the world market by punitive tariffs, was also in Russia, the desire to be accepted as a member of the (established by the United States) WTO. The next event was the think tank that is the demand that Russia should use its exports to world market prices - as well as on Ukraine. Also, the supply price for gas to Ukraine and Russia came under criticism, very gently announced the gradual adjustment of the gas price for Ukraine. The price should be increased $ 50 per 1000 cubic meters to 90 USD, which the U.S. President Yushchenko refused rigorously controlled there. Plain Speaking: The U.S. demanded Russia applying world market prices and at the same time rejected the U.S. in over their vassals Yushchenko an adjustment to world prices. One way or another in Russia had the Rockefellers of think tanks, and thus go from the United States set up traps.
In September 2005, was "allowed" the president of Ukraine, Yushchenko, arriving in Washington with Condoleezza Rice, and was ordered to report and fix the plan. The Ukraine had afterwards at any price negotiations with Russia and insisted on the same highly subsidized price of 50 USD per 1000 cubic meters of gas. And Russia to be included with the desire and the need in the WTO, had at least gradually adjust the price of gas in the direction of world prices. To accelerate the conflict also paid by Ukraine of the current gas deliveries stop, while at the same time by U.S. think tanks in Europe 'showdown' CDU-politician and capital-trust devout politicians and the Western press on the forthcoming Ukraine - Russia waited . was
for non-payment and lack of willingness to negotiate price on 1 January 2006, the Ukraine, turned off the gas valve, while the gas supply was located by the parallel pipeline to Western Europe with gas supplies from Russia unchanged - and as expected, Condoleezza Rice flew to Kiev and then only then on to Turkmenistan - Ukraine during the gas that was destined for Western Europe, had simply stolen and it fills their own gas reservoirs. The following day, Condoleezza Rice joined with fellow graduating every U.S. President a tilted gas supply 40 million cubic meters of gas at a price of 50 USD per 1000 cubic meters. However, this gas was in Turkmenistan - where you could not drain it into the air to get in a few thousand kilometers Yushchenko armed with a quiver in the air and the gas hopsend like butterflies again captures from the air. The gas was only through the pipelines from Turkmenistan, be through the pipelines from Kazakhstan and then passed through the pipelines from Russia. Transit contracts were not closed to the countries at the time.
The amount of gas stolen by Ukraine were of course not in Western Europe - and now began the previously planned and prepared defamation campaign against Russia for alleged unreliability of delivery. The purpose of the entire operation was the discrediting of Russia concerning the alleged unreliability of delivery with the aim that within Germany and the EU, the Nord Stream gas pipeline would be rejected by the Baltic Sea. Thus
used the USA by a Machiavellian plan of energy supplies For the second time as a weapon against Russia! While accusing the U.S. still has Russia, energy supplies to use as a weapon, but it is the U.S. itself, using energy supplies as a weapon, the U.S. is false, deceptive and try to force all countries in the world in its dependence. The merit Schroeder and Putin was to have Germany again provides an independence.
aforementioned is the concise correction of what s.Zt. was done, and I was able to observe up close. All points are all suitably detailed and I'm happy, this liars in front of the German-influenced U.S. media to represent a public TV conference.
But further in the interview with Ambassador Kotenew:
- question: What are typical Russia stereotypes?
- SE Kotenew: First, the Russian Government was of the KGB. Second, Russia is no democracy. Third, there is no press freedom.
comment:
So, you can normally wander around the Lyubyanka, the headquarters of the FSB (formerly KGB was called). The FSB has nothing frightening. Of course, applies to all government information from the state's own intelligence, as Germany also information from the BND, and the protection of the Constitution applies. And I say to no one that if Mr Kinkel or not Steinmeier headed the BND. Anyway, I feel much safer in Moscow and freer than in the Federal Republic. Because Germany is a response to German interests, but this peculiar subordination to U.S. interests in Germany makes life unpredictable ... except maybe for just a small average employees or workers. Anyone who has lived abroad, also know as our own intelligence work, facades behind which they hide, and that is under the supervision of German as a German services - and suddenly discover that as a German is not so free, even in Germany, as was thought before! ! ! For something you develop over time their own special antennas, a sixth sense. However, when I get into Domodjedovo off the plane, then I breathe freely, I feel free. My seventh sense says to me, I find myself once more into a free country. Domodjedovo is located at one of Moscow airports.
The criticism that Russia was no democracy is a purely rhetorical statement. For what is democracy? In Russia there has been no referendum - although the Duma election was a referendum trains. But what really is democracy? May vote in the German on the EU Treaty? This Contract should at least have constitutional status - and in the Basic Law states that it should be replaced by the sovereign (ie the people) have to be adopted constitution. And now allows the "Chancellor" Angela Merkel not a democracy. Probably corresponds to the avoidance of a referendum regarding the EU constitutional treaty in its commitment to Rockefeller on the occasion of the Bilderberg conference in 2005, when it by Rockefeller, the chancellor was promised. However, when Lever parliamentarians as representatives of the people by means of so-called imperative mandate to enforce undemocratic decisions of the people as sovereign, then the country is a dictatorship. Democracies, there is actually nowhere in perfection. Is the government in a Dictatorship for the sake of the population, it is nothing wrong with it. But the German dictatorship works against the interests of their own people! It is enough that everyone just think about it, so he agrees - and what not!
on the claim lack of press freedom in Russia even 'Der Spiegel' in a moment of derangement peculiar had provided a true indication, probably in the assumption that this discrediting Russia's press freedom. Der Spiegel wrote that in Russia 65% of the press are regierungsbeeinflußt. Hm, so what? ? That surely means that 35% of the press in Russia are free! In Germany there are 99% of the media disseminate government propaganda. I write here in Global Politics, a weekly magazine, which is located abroad - to report freely.
- question hm -
- SE Kotenew: still believed that Russians drink buckets of vodka. Moreover, there is the picture of these newly rich Russians who throw money around, and the Mafia. For the people here, Russia has always remained the same Russia: the Russia of Tsarist Russia, the Russia of the Soviet empire and now the Russian Federation. That's all Russia. I understand that, finally, have the borders of Germany changed in the last century, a few times, and yet Germany in the eyes of other nations always been Germany. But you have these periods differ from each other.
- question have also changed the internal structure and the mentality in the Russian intelligence services?
- SE Kotenew: came during the October Revolution of 1917 the Bolsheviks with Lenin, and they wanted to create a new world order. They opened all the archives of the Czar - but no one has made counter-steps. And proceed to Vadim Bakatin, the last chairman of the KGB. He surrendered to the Americans in 1991, the scheme of bugging devices in the American Embassy in Moscow in the hope that the Would do the same. It was a gesture of good will. A few years later we built a new Russian embassy in Washington, and finally turned out that the Americans had built an underground tunnel under our message with monitoring systems. So I will tell you that all states have intelligence agencies, including us. Of course we have no more KGB. Why was there ever such a powerful repressive apparatus? Because it would become after the turmoil of World War II and the then-revolutionary Russia to an easy target for a dozen powers, including Germany. And of course because it was Hitler.
comment
Russians are drinking buckets of vodka? Absolutely not. Otherwise, they would not fit on the legs in the morning and clear in my head - because they are any less inferior in work than in Germany. Rather, now the Germans are the drunkards. In Russia, one at work in the matter - and that means you no longer drinks out of his mind.
Since HE Kotenev brought up by the year 1917, I have to explain a little bit of it.
So here I must then go back a very well until 1917 - and a little further. Established in 1904 in England, a certain Halford Mackinder, the Heartland theory, which was afterwards raised to the theorem. It states that maritime nations (particularly Great Britain and the Commonwealth - with the long back on family clans ruled USA) could never achieve world domination, as long as they might to the central continent of Eurasia, of having to independently without using the Sea, unswervingly follow its own policy .
Now England and Great Britain is dominated by the Rothschild clan - simply by the enormous mass of money. The assets of the Rothschilds is inconceivable in a range of many tens of thousands of billions - accumulated during the last two centuries. But Russia was and is rich. It is an asset or feature to add their own wealth was and is paranoid megalomania.
used as a Zionist Jew Rothschild link to the present in Russia Khazar Jews, to Bronstein, who later called himself Trotsky, who was married also to a woman ship (the family boat was in the duplex of the Jewish ghetto in Frankfurt neighbor with the family Rothschild). Trotsky was a representative of the Bolsheviks and the Bolsheviks worked for Rothschild. And Lenin was given for the coup (later known as Revolution) by John D. Rockefeller (including Jews), nor the sum of ten million dollars in gold. The assets of the royal family was entrusted with great confidence of the Rothschild Bank in Paris. During the "revolution" was from England (where was the Rothschild family head), the response to the asylum request of the royal family as long as delayed until the latter was murdered. The assets of the royal family, the Rothschilds put into his own pocket and have it suppressed until today. You could call it a murderer. Only one is not as rich, if a family clan or group of people would not have met by criminal energy. In the next 70 years Russia was ruled by Khazar Jews. Bolshevism was a social concept of the Rothschilds. Under Yeltsin, who was using Rockefeller CIA Robert Gates coup to power, the Khazar Jews gained still more power and money, which but requires a separate and specific article. Only with progress of the Khazar Jews lost in Yeltsin's Russia in influence and power. Since then, Russia is ruled by a Russian, a Russian patriot who wants his country to the best of forces and reached. His name is Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin.
The 'Cold War' is, since President Putin has again taken the fate of Russia in Russian hands, broken out in full. This can be seen in the ongoing smear campaign and mendacious propaganda against Russia. The fact that again the activities of intelligence agencies play a role is, of course.
But with further Interview the SE of the Russian ambassador:
- Question: According to Russian intelligence are now nothing more than properly functioning authorities?
- SE Kotenew: ... so it is. By the way, they work more closely with their American, French and German colleagues in the fight against terrorism. And the fact that Putin has already served in the structures of the FSB, as they were called KGB, is overstated in the West completely.
- question: hm
- SE Kotenew: any case, we find the Russians German coverage our intelligence agencies a little strange. Take the tragic murder of Alexander Litvinenko, who is always referred to here as an agent. An agent is generally understood in a scout. Who goes to another country and collects information there.
- Question: As Vladimir Putin mid-80s in Dresden.
- SE Kotenew: that way. Litvinenko was an agent, they first prison guard. With the demise of the Soviet Union fell apart and the KGB, because there is too little and the people deserved more transactions made to be able to feed their family. The real professionals went away and then were even prison guards committed, because they had no one else.
- question Why is there a company in your country such as Memorial, which advocates for historical information and human rights?
- SE Kotenew: I do not know everything about the work of Memorial, but I feel that exaggerate a lot. It is good that deal with human rights. But here you see again the false understanding. For example, when I appeared on the show by Sabine Christiansen, as was said, Kasparov was a dissident. It is naive to call him as a dissident. This can be only one, who in a Totalitarian State, lives in a state that takes political dissidents jailed or even killed. It is crucial that these people are not allowed to leave the country. The Russia of today is but an open country, where people like Kasparov can protest publicly with crossed ballots and are to be assisted by Russian and foreign media all the time.
- question: Why did Kasparov was recently arrested at a demonstration in Moscow?
- SE Kotenew: He was arrested because he hurt with his bodyguards, the Russian law, by an authorized rally in a non- authorized demonstration by train through the center of the city was transformed.
- question the radio station "Echo Moskvy" said Kasparov, however, he and other protesters were run only on the sidewalk.
- SE Kotenew: about such details is to decide by the court. This breach was not the first. The man does not go to demonstrations, to express his beliefs.
- question Why?
- SE Kotenew: You have to ask him. But watch out times: in press conferences Kasparov can be seen mainly two microphones, ARD and ZDF, not CNN, not the Voice of America ".
- question Are you saying that Americans would take him seriously?
- SE Kotenew: But, they take it seriously. But it's interesting that it just accompany the German cameras everywhere.
- question However, he was in his own words again unloaded at Sabine Christiansen, because you would have insisted.
- SE Kotenew: That's not true.
comment on the interview:
Litvinenko had been for purely financial reasons, the Khazar Jews tendered Berezovsky, who fights out of hunger for power by all those who had given him the possibility of further looting of Russia built - President Putin.
And about Kasparov read HERE under "Kasparov" . It is unnecessary that I repeat myself several times. Kaparov is an "agent provocateur" for the U.S. and Rockefeller, the at least fulfills the duty to serve in the German media as a propaganda spectacle. Incidentally, Kasparov also a Khazar Jew, is his original name: Garik Weinstein and support of the U.S. Order 'Flame Award' of the NSAC.
And now back to the interview:
- question: Is the press in Russia free?
- SE Kotenew: Most Russians see it. You know, when I look at the mission of John Kerner with the sacking of Eva Herman had a look - the way a lot about the media in some primary taste - I found out that the term uniformity is a Nazi term. It is clear to me what is meant when it used more often this term in reference to Russian media. In Russia, however, you can absolutely hear opposing views on television.
- question ... How do you explain that Kremlin critics like Vladimir Ryzhkov will not be invited into political programs and that viewers of the first channel to wonder why these channels do not criticizes Putin?
- SE Kotenew: other day I listened in Wiesbaden at the most important Russian-German Petersburg Dialogue Forum Society one of our best presenters Vladimir Solovyov.
- question ... an outspoken supporter of Putin's policy ...
- SE Kotenev: He has lived in America and told his German colleagues when he returned from America, he would often American Journalists asked for his assessment of the situation. But the more he understood the situation in Russia, the less they asked him. "I was not more interesting," he said, "because I am in favor of Putin." German journalists complain because not speak Russian minister with them. So they go to Kasparov and any other Kremlin critics. But Solovyov said, with him all the ministers stood in line to be invited to his talk show. (Well, only from such programs can learn a lot about the current policy, not to mention the publications of the leading political scientists.)
And now once more a commentary on Press freedom in Russia: can
That you hear in Russia the opposite opinions and views, see and read, I have experienced. Only two times I met someone with whom I had also fought properly. Pros and cons Putin Putin is not compatible, and I look at the situation in 1998 and 1999 to the end of the Yeltsin era and could take Russia in 2006 and 2007 and the achievements of President Putin himself in appearances. But Germany also had a president like Putin - the company in Germany would not be divided, the "recovery" would not only be mere lie! Of course, I have extensively the shows on TV followed, if only by as much as possible to hear the Russian language, even by listening to his improved language skills, if during the day to deal only мямил и шепелявил (slurred speech). Mostly, the media, however, expressed positive about Putin - after all there is, as far as I can tell, no reason to comment negatively about him. In all areas, he has promoted Russia. We shall look also how much Russia was the end of the US-Yeltsin-time on the ground, this power of President Putin is so amazing and admirable, that it would be amazing to me as if someone would not recognize his achievements.
come to criticisms I still under the following part of the interview - about Anna Politkovskaya.
But here it comes to press freedom - and Global Politics is a weekly magazine, which deals mostly with politics. With the transformation of global politics as a blog in a regular weekly also this press organ is recorded normally. In regard to the censorship of the press, as it was prescribed for Germany in November 2001, I have deliberately chosen as an editor for the domiciliation of Global Politics in Moscow - Russia is a country of my knowledge of press freedom. I will not conceal
but the message that reached me yesterday with regard to http://www.tecchannel.de/schwerpunkt/Internet-Zensur.html a communication from Mr. Preuss of Reporters Without Borders:
From 04:02 .2008
outdoor writers and bloggers face penalties
Russia plans tighter Internet censorship
authoritarian Russia follows ruled states of Central Asia and will take strict censorship on the Internet. This could still turn out strict as for example in China.
"Currently, the Internet in Russia, fortunately, is relatively free. However, there is already a state agency, the warnings of when laws are violated," said the CIS officer Jakob Preuss Reporters Without Borders in conversation with pressrelease. In the future, not only access restrictions and government controls on home pages and e-mails out, but the mere visit of "forbidden" websites by the user is punishable.
A still secret, according to draft legislation, which is due at the time the committee for information policy in the Russian Senate, will surf freely especially on those home pages prevented which are located on the index.
"The Russian Prosecutor begins relatively quickly determined. This is especially the press and the law on extremism often arises," says Preuss. Comments in forums and blogs are also investigated. "This is also possible, for example, insults or Putin cartoons," it says of the experts.
The Russian media is generally of rigid state control through it. "A major problem in Internet censorship by the state will be the implementation of laws," said Preuss is optimistic. Many journalists, whose leaves or transmitting stations were directly affected by repression, have the Internet fled to express their views critical of the government further to the outside. "For the journalists of course it is good that this island still exist. The Internet is experiencing tremendous growth in Russia and finds not only in cities but also in the country becoming more widespread," says Preuss. The authors of that future remains uncertain for now.
from the state censorship and control of a necessary protection against extremism and terrorism and the fight against pornography and pedophilia are well founded. Apparently also called for the Russian Orthodox Church action. Critics counter again, that the proposed law does not protect against such threats could and see in the plans only further attempts to enforce uniformity of the media. "While there are still critical Russian newspapers. In most cases, these reach only a very limited basis, making the Internet more accessible to journalists is important," concludes Preuss. (Pte / hal)
However, further to the interview:
- Cicero Question: Was the late Anna Politkovskaya a talented journalist?
- SE Kotenew: It was definitely a passionate investigative journalist, has brought about their work constantly in danger. And because she was a critic of Putin, it has received for its life time, all kinds of prizes from Western media. Of course, the murder of her is terrible to her as a woman and as a mother yet. However, I was reading again murdered by a banker, the fifth in 2007. But the newspapers here write only about the journalists who are killed. Here, the murder of the banker is no less severe. Unfortunately, this situation is a sad side effect of the transformation stage, the closest Russian society.
this comment:
Had Mrs. Politkovskaya wrote for President Putin, they would have learned in the West no attention. It is unfortunate that they probably can not have the information readily available, where and when Ibn Al Khattab and Shamil Basayev through the training camp of the CIA and the ISI went to were as mercenaries for the war first in Afghanistan and then trained in Chechnya and Dagestan .
It honors them that it was the sorrow of the people in the war zones at heart so deeply touched, but would for the first Yeltsin and then-President Putin will leave this part of Russia, the U.S. and its mercenary terrorists? For quite unambiguously were both mercenaries worked for the U.S., were trained in Amir Muawia and Markaz-i-Dawar and Saudi Arabia (Bush family friend of Bin Laden) funded. Unfortunately, however, had
Anna Politkovskaya for "anti-Putin action 'their last task to fulfill - to be murdered on Putin's birthday. Made sense to her murder of Zionist Anglo-American perspective, if you look at the exact sequence of events. In April 2006 was held in Tomsk, the German-Russian business summit in the Russian, as well as from a German perspective, a resounding success. In September of that year stood at President Putin's visit with complete business delegation in Dresden on the St. Petersburg summit, should be avoided in the Anglo-American perspective, a renewed success at any price, it was about Germany and Russia to divide. President Putin's birthday and the day of his arrival in Dresden, then the talks were overshadowed by the St. Petersburg summit of the murder of Anna Politkovskaya - there was no further financial success more in Dresden. Anna Politkovskaya had met from the perspective of the Zionist cartel financial and power their mission.
And now the last part of the interview:
- question you call your country open to modernity and the new. The same also says the designated presidential candidate, Dmitry Medvedev. What do you mean?
- SE Kotenew: Yes, the 42-year-old Dmitry Medvedev is the new generation of politicians. Russia seeks in the future. We develop new technologies, we travel into space, we want security in this world to a new level. This also means openness to other cultures such as China and India. Finally, there is not just Hollywood.
- question Hollywood?
- SE Kotenew: sold in the 90 years we Americans big money for a lot of films from the third and fourth series of their productions. This soap opera is constantly looking at it in Russia. Now we have always demanding more of their own productions, Russian and of commercial film companies. But of course we do not live in isolation in this world. In Hollywood, playing Russian film actors, it calls them away, but now, sadly, that the Germans play in Hollywood the Nazis and the Russians, the Mafia.
The original of the interview without any explanatory comments is available at: http://www.cicero.de/97.php?ress_id=1&item=2338
Comment:
That in Russia is developing new technologies, interested citizens known. That these technologies not only to space or restrict the security technology, but even fewer people in the West. In medical technology, there are new exciting developments. And that Russia with President Putin and expected to incoming President Medvedev at the same time assistant for the good of the country by Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin of patriotic interest in Russia looks forward to an ever more positive development - if it is the malevolent Zionist Anglo-American financial and power- cartel admits - it is not to doubt. Russia had never attacked another country - but have to suffer attacks from foreign countries. Russia is left alone, so also Russia's neighbors have nothing to fear. Only the German Chancellor Merkel has destroyed the very good relations on the shameful. The Russian is a native of related peace-loving man.
From the German point of view it is certainly just as unfortunate - to be allowed to play in Hollywood, only the evil Nazis. Alone is the American-German film about the bombing of Dresden was the good, brave British and Americans, while the number was intentionally and specifically murdered civilians lying manipulated to 25,000 down - was still of Holocaust by the Western Allies deliberate mass murder of civilian German population. Only the Russian film about the Holocaust of Dresden tried to be objective - but with only 150,000 civilian victims are still far from reality, as it were well over 500,000 people in Dresden. Similarly, false reports, of course, Hollywood about Russia.
A pro-pos hypocritical - at the "moon landing" Hollywood had lied only on behalf of their own government - the moon landing was a commissioned work of Hollywood, a soap opera. Unfortunately, it is in Russia, as in Germany for a long time victim of the right kitschy Hollywood soap operas have become the pretend a fictional world and are part of the mind control.
It is time to wake up!
postscript,
HE Kotenew is of course as an ambassador of the Russian Federation in answering the interview questions to the so-called 'political correctness' bound. Them to hold me, I was not forced. As editor of 'policy-Global' I feel the truth and the comprehensive information required. Single issues require almost out separate articles - and I hope these items at the appropriate time to deliver yet.
© Rumpelstilz / Political Global / 10-2-2008
0 comments:
Post a Comment